I Did My Part
I voted today. Now we await the outcome.
It's snowing here - again - the roads are slick. Even with my 4WD I had issues on my road. The polling place is straight up a steep hill.
By the time I got there (about 10:30am), I was number 598 on the electronic ballot counter. There were lots more people behind me. It's not even noon yet! It was a steady stream of cars headed up the hill.
There was only one thing on the ballot. The Senate election.
That's pretty damned impressive if you ask me.
I'm very happy to see such a terrific turn out. Nothing is worse than apathy and no voters.
1
It's fair to say that the other 57* 49 states are watching intently. Go Scott Go!
* ObamaKount
Posted by: Rev. Paul at January 19, 2010 12:34 PM (0DZhf)
2
Not that every election isn't important, but isn't it thrilling to vote in such a high profile, meaningful election? This election is quickening the pulse of every pol watcher the country over...
Posted by: Pam at January 19, 2010 12:51 PM (UxUrZ)
3
It ranks second only to the one time I got to vote against Teddy Kennedy in the last Senate election. Just being able to vote against him (even if it didn't "work") was something I will always treasure.
Posted by: Teresa at January 19, 2010 02:46 PM (ZCuP9)
4
I don't think just the other 49 states were watching this election. I think the rest of the free world was watching to see if America is still the bastion of liberty and freedom that they believe in and desire to come to and make their new home.
Posted by: dLarry at January 19, 2010 08:38 PM (clEU0)
5
THANK YOU! for doing your part.
Tried and tried to figure out a way to vote in that thing, but I'm still breathing so being down here there just wasn't a way to work it out
Now watching returns and holding my breath - face is pretty blue now...
Posted by: patti at January 19, 2010 08:55 PM (ykXWv)
Guess We'll Find Out Next Week
If you haven't heard, there's a big election coming up next Tuesday in the State of Massachusetts (or Massachusettes if you happen to be Martha Coakley).
Here is a little observation from my husband (since he mentioned it the other day, I've been looking too and I have to say I agree with him)...
There are almost no "Coakley for Senate" signs posted in the yards in this area. None on the roads I drive on! My husband said he passes one house with a sign. One!
To understand how incredible this is, you have to have lived here for a little while. These people take their signage very seriously. Every election has them posting signs - usually many signs for the same person (in case you miss the first 5 or 6). I have seen anywhere from 5 to 10 signs in the yards of the local Democrats announcing to the world who they want to be elected.
I have seen Scott Brown signs, but all the usual suspects who had multiple (one might even say prolific) signs out for Deval Patrick and Obama/Biden... their lawns remain silent!
Does this mean anything? I have no idea. It could mean that the Dems will have to come up with quite a few extra dead voters to get Martha elected. Or it might be that it's just too cold for these peeps to head outside and pitch signs in the snow....
1
it's not like brown is the second coming of reagan, but schweet baby jeebus would it be great if he wins...and is eventually seated
Posted by: Mr. Bingley at January 15, 2010 07:24 AM (jii9y)
2
I'm waiting with excitement and hope. Now, this election is being billed as potentially ending the 60 vote thing. Even in Brown wins it will not keep the Dems from their 60 votes. They'll just trot good ol' Biden, the useful idiot, in to cast that 60th vote.
Posted by: patti at January 15, 2010 10:04 AM (ykXWv)
3
Biden can only vote in the case of ties...assuming he's still alive. Anybody heard a peep out of him recently?
Posted by: Mr. Bingley at January 15, 2010 12:30 PM (jii9y)
4
My husband has been saying all along that there is no way the Dems would let Brown win...
I'm not holding my breath on a fair election - not in this state - but wow I have been so amazed at the lack of any interest in Coakley after the primary was over.
Yeah, thank heaven the Senate isn't tied in this idiocy to take over the health care system - they might have to exhume Biden or at the very least have him text his vote in from wherever they're holding him...
Posted by: Teresa at January 15, 2010 01:16 PM (ZCuP9)
5
ooo true - momentary brain fart - GO BROWN!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: patti at January 15, 2010 01:40 PM (ykXWv)
6
oh and patti i love the zappa quote for a blog title!
Posted by: Mr. Bingley at January 15, 2010 02:11 PM (jii9y)
Posted by: Cappy at January 15, 2010 05:11 PM (yrqrQ)
8
I was at a friends house on the northshore (that's just north of Boston for you out of towners) seting up a friends new computer. The television was on in the background. During the news cast and prime time tv there were back to back to BACK ads saying how Scott Brown wanted to poison the drinking water, rape women and children and only Martha would personally bake an aple pie for every American once she got to Washington. (Okay, I made that last part up. I don't really remember an ad that said Martha could or would do anything. What I'm wondering is if the population of Massachusetts has finally gotten tired of their politicians subverting the voters will. Think about the times in Massachusetts where the citizenry has petitioned the state via referendum only to have the pols find a rule that allows them to ignore the voters petition. Anybody remember Mike Dukakis' "temporary" income tax increase? Y'know, the one the pols said they couldn't give back because the state treasury surplus might be temporary? If everybody remembers just how badly the entrenched System Lords have treated them, Coakley is about to become a speed bus under the Obama bus.
Posted by: MGA at January 16, 2010 09:15 AM (1vgXk)
9
MGA - I have seen those ads (now I mute them)... Good grief!!! I guess they borrowed the slurs from the Sarah Palin tear down. Especially the rape one - that's just the stupidest thing I've ever seen.
Posted by: Teresa at January 16, 2010 10:11 AM (ZCuP9)
10
Oh good grief! that was supposed to read "speed bump" not "speed bus." Repeat after me, "Preview is my friend."
That's what happens when you get a man trying to multi-task
Posted by: MGA at January 16, 2010 11:09 AM (1vgXk)
11
My theory on the Brown victory is that, since Kennedy was a given for the last 40 years, the gears of the Dem machine had rusted in place, and they didn't start oiling it up again until it was to late.
Posted by: Harvey at January 22, 2010 05:16 PM (QExRX)
12
Harvey - it was a very very odd thing. I have no idea what the Dems were thinking. A very badly run campaign indeed. Maybe they thought since Coakley was a woman and a Dem - everyone would just vote for her... I just don't get it.
Posted by: Teresa at January 22, 2010 06:20 PM (ZCuP9)
Calling District 41 Voters in Illinois!
I meant to blog this yesterday, but didn't quite get to it. Matty O'Blackfive is running for office!!! I'm so excited.
I'm pretty sure I have no readers from the above district... but you never know. If you do live there, you will have a most outstanding candidate to vote for in the next election! Hit the banner to get to his campaign web site.
I am very proud to call Matt my friend and I'm not at all surprised he decided to get in the game and take on the entrenched politicians that inhabit the swampland called Illinois politics. (I hope he's had all his shots - he'll need them!)
Matt is one of the few people I've met who is up to this enormous challenge. It is not for the faint of heart or for those who do not have a clear vision and firm principles. If a person lacks any of the above, they will either be absorbed into the status quo or they will be trampled by the mob.
However Matt is one of those special people who gets things done. Not only that, but he gets them done right. Since the inception of Blackfive Matt has accomplished incredible things for our military many of which are not even listed on his campaign site.
He is well versed in current political affairs and articulate (something people have lately come to realize might be a good thing for those representing us in government). And best of all he has a terrific sense of humor, a trait sorely lacking in far too many people he will be up against.
If you can't vote for Matt because you don't live in his district, please consider a small donation to help him in his election bid. If a donation isn't possible (because times are tough and many people just can't) then stop by Blackfive and wish him well.
We need men like Matt representing us. Even if the representation isn't quite direct.
Listen Up KidsThe Great School Speech is coming your way next Tuesday. The Prez hizownself is gonna talk at you and tell you to be a good student. (let us hope the teleprompter fails him not lest he be smitten with a case of the "ummms")
I have seen just a little bit online about this from a couple of bloggers. Venomous Kate knows her boy well and is not worried at all. Gregor wrote a most excellent letter to his local school district. While I applaud Gregor's attempt, I'm pretty sure there is no way to keep schools from hopping merrily on this bandwagon and wasting a bunch of time. Okay so be it.
However, there are many people up in arms and threatening to keep their kids home that day. I think it would be a huge mistake. Here's why.
Since this will be a bit long, the rest goes below the fold. Click if you are interested, pass on by if you are not.
1
Excellently reasoned, well-presented, and logically laid out.
You get an A+, ma'am!
Posted by: Rev. Paul at September 02, 2009 11:49 PM (DyTD7)
2
Well said. I don't think parents should keep their kids home, but I don't think the government should be doing it in the first place.
Posted by: Sam at September 03, 2009 08:03 AM (9t5cW)
3
Rev Paul - why thank you sir. LOL. Don't know about the A+ but I think it might come in at a solid B.
Sam - I don't think so either (I may even read the transcript to see how many times the President says "I" and "me" instead of "us" or "we"). But since it seems to be a done deal, we're stuck with it. In that case one must deal with things the best they can.
Posted by: Teresa at September 03, 2009 08:24 AM (epSz+)
I agree Teresa. My boy is home schooled but I am considering letting him listen to the speech (with me) anyway. I understand it will stream live from the White House website. And then doing just as you suggest, let him give me his impressions, then discuss with him.
Seriously I have no problem with a motivational, school is important speech from the president, even this bozo- my only concern was the list of supportive activities the White House was suggesting to go along with the speech. But I understand those have been withdrawn or re written. And that PSA - we've seen that thing on TV several times already, most of the kids out there likely have too.
Our approach has always been to have our kids give us their impressions of political issues. It has also always been my approach to make them support their positions, part of their home schooling. Even if I agree with their thoughts, I want them to be able to argue their positions with anyone.
As for the argument that the O is trying to indoctrinate our kids, Of course he is, and the schools have by and large been doing this for decades (though thank God there are a handful of wonderful teachers who do not engage in this activity). The US public school system is already dedicated to brain washing our kids to the "progressive" view of life. It is our job, as parents to do as much as we can in the home to counter the brain washing.
Posted by: patti at September 03, 2009 02:57 PM (IR4lY)
Also, I bow to you, I could never have home schooled my kids. It would never have worked at all. I'm always in awe of people who can do this!
(for that matter I stay well away from teaching anything directly - I am not and never have been a teacher... it's best to know one's limitations - LOL)
Posted by: Teresa at September 03, 2009 03:03 PM (epSz+)
6
It's never too early to indoctrinate or go on another vacation or fly in Air Force One or appoint another Czar of something or wear $350 tennis shoes! I just get all wee-wee'd up!!!
Posted by: JihadGene at September 04, 2009 12:54 PM (lcgZv)
7
Those fidgety kids will become fidgety adults, fidgeting through SixSigma indoctrination and all the other manadatory fun. That's what despair.com is for.
Posted by: Cappy at September 07, 2009 04:02 AM (rR88I)
the seat would have to remain vacant for the next 145-160 days -- thus
busting the Democrats down to 59 Senate seats -- until a special
election can be held. The Democrats would be heavily favored to win that special Senate election.
However, there appears to be at least a theoretical possibility that
the seat could be filled sooner than that. In the final weeks of his
life, Kennedy had called for the law to be changed to allow Gov. Deval
Patrick (D) to make an interim appointment, selecting a caretaker who
would represent the state and pledge not to run in the election.
Now you may be asking... what irony?
Well, the ability for the governor to appoint an interim Senator was the law until 2004. It was used in 1962 when John Kennedy became President.
But in 2004 when it looked like John Kerry might become President - guess who was governor. Go on, guess... yes that's right, Mitt Romney - a Republican.
The Dems of the state quickly changed the law... just in case. Thus making it impossible for the evil Romney to appoint a Senator the Dems may not like.
Now, of course, this is coming back to bite them. It's the most hilarious thing. The dithering...
Most everyone in the state hates the current governor (Coup Deval), but he is a Democrat and he could appoint a Dem until the next election is held.
I'm pretty sure most of the state's Democrats see nothing odd at all in changing the rules on a regular basis as long as it benefits them. Imagine the uproar if Republicans were doing this. The hypocrisy is astounding. Yet all the people of this state keep electing them to office. Amazing.
Posted by: JihadGene at August 27, 2009 11:48 AM (NeOuu)
2
T, you calls it like you sees it. And I think you definitely see how transparent all these Congressional dingleberries are. Uch, they are abhorrent.
Posted by: Erica at August 27, 2009 07:49 PM (f2hv8)
3
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. Changing horses midstream, no offense to the Swimmer, seems to be the norm for the Democrats.
Posted by: Sam at August 27, 2009 08:12 PM (9t5cW)
4
You know I have to just sit here and shake my head. I've lived here about 4 years and I'm still not "invested" in the place so I find it highly amusing.
Posted by: Teresa at August 27, 2009 09:41 PM (epSz+)
5
My husband and I were just discussing this over dinner last week before Teddy took his one way ticket to hell. Finally after talking about it for a couple minutes I said, 'We can't talk about this anymore. Stop the madnes."
Posted by: Bou at August 27, 2009 10:11 PM (vkUMO)
6
I'm glad this came back to bite them in the ass. Maybe if it happens another time or two they'll actually learn something from it. (And maybe the voters will catch on)
Posted by: Da Goddess at August 28, 2009 01:19 PM (yS1tB)
Those brain addled cackleheads will shop there and like it. Just because The Goode Family has wrapped up for the summer doesn't mean those dumb slackers are going to turn normal anytime soon.
Also, speaking of slacker numbskulls, that photo in the WSJ Weekend Journal from yesterday is most certainly not me! I was no where near Woodstock. At the time I was just a normal corn-fed Midwestern boy, trying to score beer and chicks hanging out at the corner drugstore and leading a normal life.
Posted by: Cappy at August 15, 2009 04:57 PM (Z1Brj)
2
I don't shop WF because 1) it's too far away, and 2) I don't like spending extra money on food I can buy for less at a store closer to me. Sigh.
Then again, I have a Henry's here and that's better.
Posted by: Da Goddess at August 15, 2009 08:36 PM (/2+FR)
3
Oddly, I've noticed that when I shop at Whole Foods a.k.a "Whole Paycheck," I actually spend less, but get more food...and more interesting food...than when I shop at the regular grocery store. I don't know how that is possible, because everything seems so expensive, but I've found it to be true time and again. Yet I rarely go because it is always sooo crowded, and everybody seems cranky.
Another observation I've made about WF, is that in Northern California, the people who shop there are your typical hippy type. They all look like they are in poor health, looking for a miracle cure by eating "health food." A very sickly, cranky bunch. But in Los Angeles, the majority look like they're either dressed up for an audition, hoping to be "discovered," or are fresh from their latest yoga/meditation session. Beautiful people, but still, cranky!
Anywayyyy. I read the CEO's comments, and I didn't see anything particularly inflammatory, but the comments to his comments were super inflammatory. Argh! But that just goes to support my observation that a lot of the people that shop there are indeed cranky.
Posted by: DogDontPurr at August 16, 2009 05:23 PM (1KC4A)
Posted by: Harvey at August 17, 2009 06:14 AM (QExRX)
6
Harvey - yes I do because it's the only place I can buy chicken that doesn't make me feel queasy after eating it.
Do I buy everything there? No. For heaven sake - who the hell buys their staples like paper products or foil from a WF? Not me - I don't like what they offer (not even looking at price).
I shop there for their meats - mostly it's hamburger, chicken, pork chops that kind of thing. If I want really fancy meat - I'll go to a really good restaurant where they know how to cook it too... LOL.
I am not a gourmet cook, I do basics. WF sells basic stuff at prices that are fine for me. And the added bonus of being able to eat it without feeling like crap afterward. I think it's a win-win. But that's just me.
Posted by: Teresa at August 17, 2009 09:09 AM (epSz+)
For all the brain-dead lefties who woodenly mouth the progressive mantra about "Palin thrust her kids onto the national platform when she brought them up at the convention": so did McCain. And Biden. And the Obamessiah. And every other candidate who's ever been nominated to a national office in recent memory.
It's not about their kids. Not now. Not ever.
And MAYBE now, they're starting to get it: there's a line we simply won't let them cross anymore.
Posted by: Rev. Paul at June 16, 2009 07:16 PM (b62+w)
Sarah Palin is a legitimate target for political "humor", even including Letterman,s lame attempts. That's one of the perqs of living in a free ( for now ) society, you get to criticise, and even ridicule your leaders.
Joking about statutory rape - yes, I know he supposedly meant it about the older daughter, that makes it just rape - is reprehensible. But being a child of a Republican pol makes you grist for the mill of the MSM.
Not a peep about Chelsea during the Clinton years - I'm sure she lived the life of a cloistered nun - but we sure heard about the Bush twins getting beer while underage.
But there's no double standard in the MSM. Certainly not.
Posted by: Angie at June 20, 2009 08:33 PM (4ErfV)
Tomorrow There Will Be Tea Parties
Lots of people across the nation are headed out to let the government know how they feel about the taxes crushing us since the current administration decided to spend us out of debt.
Tomorrow is tax day and is the perfect time to rise up and let the voices be heard.
I wanted to be there. I wanted to go and take pictures... lots and lots of pictures. Meet people. Show my support. It promises to be an excellent event.
Unfortunately work intervened.
One of my coworkers has had to spend the last few days helping to take care of his mother. On Friday she had cancer surgery and has had many complications set in. An ailing mother takes precedence over a tea party every time.
So, I'll be checking out the reports and wishing I could be there while I'm typing like mad.
1
That's the problem with being a right-winger. You can't attend protests because you work for a living.
On the bright side, there should be more tea parties on July 4th, which is a Saturday this year.
Unless, of course, Obama gets the message from THESE tea parties and stops spending money like Montgomery Brewster.
Posted by: Harvey at April 16, 2009 08:29 AM (LBx/f)
2
We had a TeaParty here in Miami yesterday. It was from 6pm to 8pm so us WORKING people could attend.
I took a ton of photos. Just finally got them up on my blog, (got that card reader as you suggested since I still haven't decided on a new camera....although I do need one.)
Feel free to come over and look at the photos. As I said on GOC, turn out was better than I expected but less than I hoped. Still, it was good.
On Sunday they are supposed to have another rally at the court house. Hopefully I can make that one, not sure though.
Posted by: Serenity at April 16, 2009 10:03 PM (3usbu)
Barry - Meet Daniel
I don't blog much politics. But if you have not heard this beautiful and succinct speech by Daniel Hannan of Great Britain, you are missing something incredible. (BTW he has a blog!)
If only we had anyone (and that includes our Prez - Barry - a man thought to be spectacularly articulate by a large majority of people who have no idea what the word means) who was half as well spoken as this man, with this tremendous grasp of the true problems confronting us, we might be in a position to make things better.
I Feel Kinda Bad...
Someone today (who is an Obama supporter) was happily telling me the following... You know how Caterpillar is laying off 22,000 people? Well, they did all that, then if (sorry the "since" was a typo) the stimulus bull (sorry slip of he keyboard) - ahem - stimulus bill passed, they're going to turn right around and hire them all back right away.
I hadn't heard any of it, but it sounded very odd. Even if I was an Obama supporter, I'd be trying to find out when they were gonna kick out the CEO. After all, it's expensive to lay people off. Especially in large numbers. It's not a trivial thing - there are all kinds of issues and problems and, let me reiterate, it costs money. If the stimulus bill was going to solve all their problems, why didn't they just wait to see if it went through or not??? Why go to all the trouble?
*sigh*
Yeah, I feel kinda bad because it's really hard when you strongly believe someone is going to do this miraculous job and then it turns out that... well, maybe not... to believe that this money grab will work wonders before it even gets off the ground... only to find that... oh not quite.
President Obama today repeated the claim we asked about yesterday at the press briefingthat
Jim Owens, the CEO of Caterpillar, Inc., "said that if Congress passes
our plan, this company will be able to rehire some of the folks who
were just laid off."
So there's the quote and here's the response:
Asked if the stimulus package would be able to stop the 22,000 layoffs
or not, Owens said, "I think realistically no. The truth is we're going
to have more layoffs before we start hiring again"
I have to wonder though how Obama thought he'd be able to get away with saying that. Who told him this was true? After all, it's a bit difficult to hide 22,000 people without jobs.
It shows that Obama is not given critical thinking or he would have asked the same questions I did. I have never run a large company and yet just the claim that "the bill" would immediately solve one company's problems to the extent that they are immediately back in fine business form - just sounds completely bogus. Shouldn't it sound bogus to the President too?
If he was told by an aide that this was the case and he went along with it because it "sounded" so good on tv... what else is he willing to go along with? If he made it up or just heard what he wanted to hear, that doesn't make things better - it makes them infinitely worse.
Ho-hum... back to my 1930's movies. I have a hard time tolerating this crap.
1
We just have to get through 2 years. I am shocked at how quickly the Democrats seem have screwed up their opportunity to do all sorts of horrible things that they seem to want to do. How is there so much infighting on that side already?
Posted by: Stankleberry at February 12, 2009 10:47 PM (wxMen)
2
I think I'll NyQuil myself to the gills today and put the Thin Man movies on, back to back.
That's the ticket!
Posted by: Pam at February 13, 2009 09:19 AM (l6NIn)
3
I'm kinda unplugged at the moment. Did any of this show up on the nightly news programs or did they just give it a pass?
Posted by: MGA at February 13, 2009 11:00 AM (Nudep)
4
Stankleberry - I'm really surprised too. Not that I expected much - but I thought they'd pull off some really big stuff over the next 2 years.
Pam - Nyquil works.
MGA - I have no idea - I never watch the news, although the news item online does come from ABC - which was surprising. LOL.
Posted by: Teresa at February 13, 2009 11:06 AM (ybEr8)
I'm guessing Rod's arguments were not especially persuasive.
Not sure.
Just a hunch.
But I get the feeling the Illinois state senators didn't get warm fuzzies because he turned up to give his own closing arguments today.
Since he's a Democrat, you have to love it that he sticks like glue to the Dem talking points:
"How is it an impeachable offense for helping low
income families keep their health?" Blagojevich said. "How can you
impeach a governor when what we did was about helping families and
kids?"
Oh yes, it's for the chiiillldruuun. You will notice he never says a word about "how" he tried to help the chiiiillldruuun, nothing about whether or not the law allows the governor to take particular actions.
Nope - in true Democratic form, he insists that his intentions were of the highest order and that should be enough for everyone to accept that he's a great guy. He's lookin' out for the chiiiillldruuuun.
Sure thing Roddy.
Of course after he spoke, he had to stick it to the tax payers one more time...
Blagojevich will leave the Senate and the statehouse
immediately after his closing argument to return home on a state
aircraft, to avoid any "plane issues," spokesman Lucio Guerrero said.
State lawmakers and Lt. Gov. Patrick Quinn have said Blagojevich is not
entitled to state transporation home if he is convicted and removed
before he leaves.
Yeah, heaven forbid the guy get behind the wheel of a car and drive the 4 hours up to Chicago. Or even spring for his own plane ticket.
A real man of the people is Rod.
Oops... Nearly forgot. I think someone should have given Blago a copy of this for Christmas. (Think it would've helped?)
Have Your DVR Ready
Today (yes, I suddenly realized it's well after midnight) the trial starts in Illinois. It is expected that Rod Blagojevich - the Boy Gov - will be removed from office sometime this week. Sooner rather than later I would suppose.
However, the Boy Gov seems to take issue with this.
Which leads me to wonder... what happens when the seemingly inevitable comes to pass and they vote Blago out of office? To date, the Boy Gov has pretty much ignored what everyone has said to him and suddenly started acting as if he was a real Governor instead of just playing one in Illinois. The news has been full of stories about him heading to the office with the claim that he has "work" to do for the people of Illinois.
Therefore, I have been speculating about the reaction once Roddy Boy is confronted with the vote. Will he hole up in the Governor's Mansion? (that would be a first, he has never lived there since being elected). Will he head to the Mayor's office in Chicago, throw Richie out, proclaim Chicago as the new Capitol of Illinois, and declare all the downstate lawmakers criminals? (that would make him happy since he wouldn't have to ever head to that nasty "downstate" cowtown ever again)
Different... um... ooookay. Let's have a look at what is "different".
Soon after, the governor's office would become a bunker. He installed
locks on the doors of his Capitol offices as if he was hiding
something. He began sneaking in the Capitol through basement tunnels.
He refused to live in the Executive Mansion, instead commuting between
Chicago and Springfield at taxpayer's expense.
Oddly enough the tenor of the article suggests that if Blago had been a bit more conciliatory, a bit more ready to play ball with the rest of the government, everything would be hunky dory because he's not a Republican. (if a Republican had done this, they'd be measuring the guy for a lovely straightjacket. But, since it's a Dem... well, it's just a little odd)
However, after reading the article, I now believe it is not outside the realm of possibility for him to do something... interesting. I would not be surprised to see him make a mad dash to his office, lock himself in as soon as they start the vote, and refuse to come out. (have they checked the room for weapons?)
In any case, I expect even more bizarre behavior before this is over. Some of it may even take place on camera. Stay tuned.
Now just in case this gives you the mistaken impression that I either like the guy or feel sorry for him... PULEEZE!!!
Stop and think about it for a moment. Think about the "law of unintended consequences". If AG Lisa Madigan had been successful - what would be the outcome for all future governors of the state - no matter what party? If you piss off the "right people" they'll have you declared insane.
What?
So, if Lisa were ever able to be elected governor (which is apparently something she is very interested in doing) she'd have to be looking over her shoulder the entire time... waiting for the opposition to jump on something she does or says and have her declared insane. Because that's the way these things work. I bet her enemies could make a pretty good argument after this last week that she's "power hungry" and an "egomaniac" trying to oust Bobby Boy just because she doesn't like him...
I don't think Bobby Boy is insane. I'm pretty sure he's not. He's an Illinois politician without any finesse. He's young and (so it seems now) stupid. Instead of being subtle about using his leverage - like all other Illinois politicians - he decided he could skip the niceties and strong-arm. Worst of all he has a foul mouth about it. In an age where you can't sit through 99% of movies without having a multitude of 4 letter words thrown at you - people are still shocked to hear them being emitted by pols. (go figure)
I'm willing to bet he's gotten away with this crap since he started his way up the political ladder. The more it worked, the more bold he has become.
There are laws in place to deal with this kind of idiocy. Like any laws, they don't work unless they are used. So now it's time to USE them. Let the impeachment process roll, let the feds take their case to court. Stop trying to shortcut and set a precedent that is tremendously dangerous in the future.
Now all we have to hope is that Fitzgerald has the case well in hand and hasn't screwed it up before it started. Sounds like he jumped into this early. If he messes it up just to stop Bobby Boy from appointing a Senator - then he's a bigger fool than Blago and that's saying something.
Update: I want to add that after this fiasco of Lisa Madigan trying to unseat Blago in this way - not only do I think she will not ever be elected Governor, but I don't think she should be. This episode leaves a very bad taste in the mouth.
1
I find the guy an Illinois version of a Sandy Berger. Stooooopid ass! I still think Sandy should be doing time for his crime in the name of Bubba.
Posted by: JihadGene at December 17, 2008 10:54 PM (no8nn)
2
Insane? No. But he is more than a bit of a psychopath with poor impulse control.
Mark my words, he will NOT step aside and he will not quit. Right now the state of Illinois is, as my pal Og would say, verfuckled.
I'm all for letting the law run its course... but the people of this state are going to take a mighty hit -- financially and legislatively -- in the meantime, especially since Patrick Fitzgerald has asked the legislature to think long and hard about what they use to impeach him, as they could royally screw up the federal case if they pursue the same lines of inquiry.
Argh. Merry Christmas to us.
Posted by: Omnibus Driver at December 18, 2008 02:05 PM (LBZjj)
3
I hate to say it, but they verfuckled themselves when they elected the bozo. Heh.
Posted by: Teresa at December 18, 2008 02:32 PM (smhqn)
4
Don't I know it -- unfortunately for those of us who were smart enough to vote otherwise...
We may as well just hand our wallets over now.
Posted by: Omnibus Driver at December 19, 2008 02:07 PM (LBZjj)
5
Yeah, that's the worst is that the smart people voted against this guy... unfortunately there seem to be far more idiots in the world than smart people and the idiots ruin it for everyone. *sigh*
Posted by: Teresa at December 19, 2008 03:53 PM (smhqn)
6
I'm certain it was a rather hamfisted attempt at a headline grab by the AG. Either that, or she should turn in her law degree. No judge in his or her right mind would entertain that case. Not only is it an obviously political matter (or criminal matter, which is being sorted out by Fitzwhatshisname), but the evidence (i.e. courtroom evidence) is just not there. The judge is supposed to remove an elected governor from office based on a complaint in a separate case, newspapers stories and presumably some paid-for opinion that the guy is nuts.
At this point, I believe most people (myself included) think that the guy is a thieving turd and a flaming asshole and maybe even a nutbar, but fortunately for all of us, the law requires a bit more than people's opinions.
Posted by: Jim - PRS at December 20, 2008 03:57 AM (KjOxW)
Votey Stuff
Got a call about 8:45 this morning from darling daughter in her car headed to work - finally. She got to her polling place in Chicago at about 6:10 this morning. The line was already around the block. She waited an hour and a half to vote then had to fight traffic out of the city to get to work. I told her to leave work early (she's been pretty sick with the flu the last couple of days) because traffic back into Chicago will be a total nightmare tonight.
I just got back from my polling place. The big problem here is tiny parking lot space, skinny roads, and in a place no one can walk to from their home! I took a far away spot and walked in rather than circle around trying to get close. There was a line inside, but it went pretty quickly.
I have voted.
This time the "big" vote that makes me happy... I got to vote against John Kerry for Senate. Woot!
You know what this means... so many people voted early - they won't be able to call the election using exit polls.
ROFLMAO - excellent. Not that I'll be watching. Just knowing that news idiots will be squirming over whether or not their "counts" are good - well, that is freakin' hilarious.
Anyone who hangs or burns effigies is a douchebag. I usually find that they are anti-Our Side, but regardless of whether they are Obama or Palin, I would like to kick their asses, especially, IMHO, when one is in response to another. Bullshit begets bullshit. It may be a Constitutional freedom of expression, and that's all fine and whatever, but it also doesn't necessarily mean that you aren't a mental turd, because...and this is just me...there isn't any intellectual sharing of ideas...it's just HATE...hate...hate...hate...and it's so much easier to light a freakin' match to giant doll or a flag than to actually explain a well thought out argument of why you are in favor or against something. People are dumb, ignorant assholes...that, in my opinion, is why they burn shit. Hate Bush? Burn his likeness...oh, cummon...it's so easy. But do not tell me the world is a better place with Saddam Hussein, because anyone who believes otherwise is just a freakin' putz.
Posted by: Erica at October 30, 2008 07:01 PM (QvlE2)
E - not saying either one of these goofballs was right. They are, in fact, total idiots. I was just noting the double standard in handling the offense which I find very funny. Especially as law enforcement everywhere knows this will all be commented upon nationally. Heh.
Posted by: Teresa at October 31, 2008 10:27 AM (mMa3+)
4
I had a feeling some idiot would do this. I also had a feeling they would get punished, while the douchebags who hung the Sarah Palin sign would go unpunished. Life sucks then you die.
Posted by: Carmen at October 31, 2008 10:28 AM (ICKzK)
5
It's wrong and offensive all the way around but there is indeed a double standard. No surprise, really. (Sadly)
Posted by: Richmond at October 31, 2008 11:36 AM (RCeqK)
6
I'm so frustrated with the election news I can't even comment on anything anymore other than "GAH."
Posted by: dogette at November 01, 2008 07:09 PM (Y4WGz)
It Ain't Over Til It's Over
Yogi Berra was a wise man.
It happens in sports all the time. One team believes they have the game sewn up, the other team comes back at the last minute and wins it. Prior to the comeback - the announcers are all talking as if the game is done.
Why play the rest - the other team will never win. What's the point? Why don't we call it a game and go home now? For that matter, after listening to the pre-game shows on the weekends I often wonder why they play the games at all. Why not just appoint the winners and save us lots of anxiety as we watch the game unfold?
Boston looked to be on the verge of elimination in Game Five at Fenway
Park on Thursday, when the Rays held a 7-0 lead in the seventh inning.
But the Red Sox battled back for the win, becoming the first team since
1929 to overcome a deficit of seven runs in a playoff game.
We left the local bar at the end of the 7th inning thinking it was over.
Virginia Tech; trailing 10-0 with 4:11 left in the game, he led the Eagles on a nine-play, 92-yard scoring drive in 2:05...after BC recovered the onside kick, he put together a seven-play, 66-yard drive that culminated with a 32-yard touchdown pass to Andre Callender with 11 seconds remaining in the game; finished the game 25-52 for 285 yards and two touchdowns...
I turned that game on - saw the time (5 minutes left) and turned it off never believing they could make a comeback win.
Therefore, I too fall into the "geeze it's over" crowd.
Go out and vote on election day - then we'll see. Until then, it's all propaganda. Every word - good and bad.
It will be over when the votes are counted.
Do not listen to polls. Do not listen to talking heads - they are just like sports announcers. They've decided already, but the game has not even begun.
Posted by: Carmen at October 23, 2008 10:42 AM (ICKzK)
4
The late Skip Caray used to say, "that's why they play the games." The only poll that matters is the one on November 4. I've already voted in that one, and 0bama lost.
Posted by: John H at October 24, 2008 03:48 PM (M2fzX)
NEW YORK — Billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg has decided to push for a change in the city's term-limits law and run for another four years, a person who has been briefed on the matter told The Associated Press on Tuesday. ... The Democrat-turned-Republican-turned independent
has long been a staunch supporter of the term-limits law but had hinted
in recent months that he'd be willing to overturn the measure.
Apparently he is a STAUNCH supporter of anything that doesn't get in the way of what he wants to do. And what he wants to do is keep the job of Mayor.
Well Mr. Bloomberg, all you have to do is convince enough of the populace that New York City NEEDS you. It will never survive without you. Piece of cake - start calling everyone who disagrees with you a racist. That should get you all the votes you need.
Remember Gentle Readers: A Liberal by any other name still wants to be in charge so he can tell you what's best.
Yes, I think giggling is in order. If New York decides to let him get away with it, then derisive laughter is next on the agenda.
Posted by: dogette at October 01, 2008 01:08 PM (Y4WGz)
2
I can tell you one thing: He's no Rudy. I've about had enough of this nannying Mayor Bloomberg, and his hissy fits, and wanting to micromanage all of our lives. He's a doosh.
Posted by: Erica at October 02, 2008 07:38 AM (OQDyt)
3
I had the same thought...rules are great, until they prevent me from doing something. Heh.
Posted by: Sarah at October 04, 2008 09:43 AM (TWet1)
The Hi-Tech Milk Argument
I was over perusing Instapundit to see what's happening. I missed most everything yesterday due to work, but there's always Saturday morning (after Starbucks) to catch up.
I ran across this post which is long with numerous links. The first link in the post is to yet another link filled post yesterday. Both of them pointing out the Obama campaign's focus of the moment... Wait for it...
John McCain can't send email!!! He doesn't get online much!!!
Oh the horror! How could this be?
As I was poking through the links, reading about John McCain's war injuries making it impossible for him to type, thus taking away, early on, the only way it was possible for a person to be "online"*** something occurred to me, something everyone seems to be missing.
Of course the general thrust of the argument is that McCain is an old fogy who is out of touch with the modern world. The problem with that argument is - it proves nothing of the sort. It's like saying the CEO of a company is unable to direct things to make the company more profitable because he doesn't sit in the factory building widgets.
What do they expect McCain to do with email? Oh how about this:
Vlad you dipweed, get the hell out of Georgia now. How could you be such an asshole? Take your f*&^ing tanks and go home or we'll bring in our tanks and stomp your collective asses!
Now that would go over very well, don't you think. Or maybe they think he should twitter all his followers in government telling them what he's up to right now.
Long day, have to deal with that idiot Pelosi woman.
Right. Let's strive for a little bit of sense. The President is supposed to be directing the country. By all accounts McCain is fully aware of the internet as a campaign tool and has used it well. He does not sit down and put it together himself, he hires people who are experts to do the job. Isn't that what the top level executives are supposed to do? See an opportunity and find the people who can help him use it. Or is he supposed to stop everything, roll up his sleeves and do all the coding himself?
Is Obama trying to tell us if he gets into office, that he'll be sending out emails to his staff to give them orders? That he'll spend a few hours every morning perusing Drudge or Kos or one of the other online sites to find out "what's going on in the world"? Now there's a scary thought.
I want a chief executive who will be directing the overall picture. Not someone who is worried about the details. Detail people micro-manage projects into the ground.
You may be asking about my title to the post - where does the "milk" enter the picture? Well, right here. This is exactly the same silliness we get when reporters ask a candidate "do you know how much a gallon of milk and a loaf of bread cost?"
It is an irrelevant question. It tells us nothing about their leadership skills and whether or not they can direct a government - nothing. It only tells us that they either do or do not shop in a grocery store. (It may not even tell us that because even though I buy bread - I don't ever remember the price between grocery visits and I haven't bought a gallon of milk in years)
So let's get a grip. McCain, like Obama knows about the internet. He directs people to use the internet to help his campaign. If the Obama campaign wants to show that McCain is out of touch with the modern world - they need to come up with something else. They won't but they should.
However, I'm used to politicians and reporters wasting my time with irrelevant nonsense. That is one never changing constant in every campaign.
1
Actually my first thought as to why it could even be BAD for a President to use email was to do with the potential security or even national security issues such use could create. If that makes any sense.
Posted by: dogette at September 13, 2008 12:19 PM (61KDM)
2
Oh absolutely Dogette! Email is horrendously insecure. Much better to not commit to pixels in national security issues. Heh.
Posted by: Teresa at September 13, 2008 12:24 PM (mMa3+)
3
I thought McCain should go for the voice activated computer, too. And @#*$ Imamobama's attempts to belittle him for not wanting to play on Facebook and Myspace all day. Imamobama can go twitter himself right now.
Posted by: Da Goddess at September 14, 2008 11:27 PM (njkk7)