December 31, 2006
Wishing everyone a wonderful Happy New Year.
Posted by: Teresa in
FUN
at
06:59 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
December 30, 2006
First via Solomonia we have a non-satirical response from Scott Ott to a newspaper editor. Don't miss it.
Then from Hugh Hewitt we have an interview with Joseph Rago.
That the WSJ would hire someone with so little in the way of critical thinking skills is very troubling. I realize he's very young, but eventually he will be responsible for approving content for some news site somewhere... scary.
I would say there should be a required class in critical thinking given in schools, but who would teach it?
Here's my previous post on the subject.
Happy Reading!
Posted by: Teresa in
Current Affairs
at
10:56 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 124 words, total size 1 kb.
Your New Year's Resolutions |
 1) Get a pet Tasmanian devil 2) Eat less garlic 3) Travel to China 4) Study abnormal psychology 5) Get in shape with water skiing |
A pet... just what I need.
Less garlic... but I LIKE garlic!
Travel to China... let me get my passport sounds like fun.
Study Abnormal Psychology... I read enough MSM headlines to know I wouldn't like it.
Get in shape with Water Skiing... tried it once - skiing of any type is not for me.
I figure this takes care of my need to think up any other resolutions. Now I can drink Champagne and have fun on New Year's Eve instead of worrying about all the things I need to work on in the coming year.
Posted by: Teresa in
FUN
at
09:41 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 162 words, total size 2 kb.
December 28, 2006
A valid U.S. passport will be required starting Jan. 23, if you're traveling between the United States and Canada, Mexico, Central and South America, the Caribbean, and Bermuda."The only places now outside of the 50 states where one will not need a passport to fly to are U.S. possessions, like Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands," said Andy Caraber, of Colpitts World Travel.
Caraber said that even newborns will be required to have passports.
I don't remember where the post was, but blog sis Quality Weenie has already run across this when coming back from Canada... before the law was really in effect! She was soundly harassed by our own border guards because she was traveling without her passport.
Oh yes, if you do update or are issued a first time new passport, it will include an RFID chip. (for that matter many European passports have them too)
These are the computer chips that allow you to waive things like a credit card or a "speedpass" at a reader without having to swipe the card. You've probably all seen the commercial with the runner who stops at a convenience store and just taps his credit card on the reader before dashing out to continue the race... that would be an RFID chip allowing him to do this.
If you are worried about possibly exposing your personal information to an identity thief, you can also get one of these to block anyone from reading your passport with "drive-by" readers.
There are supposed to be safeguards on the coding of the chip. Whether or not these are done well is still up in the air. For that matter, I don't know if they have been implemented at all and I'm not inclined at the moment to go searching. I just wanted to point out that the chip is now there and you can get a special cover to protect your passport or... you can take a hammer to the chip itself (which some people have done in pursuit of privacy - that's a bit over the top for me). But this leads to another point.
From July of this year in Computer World there is an article with the pros and cons of having RFID chips in passports. Of those who are downplaying the issue the argument goes...
Other experts downplayed such potential flaws. "The only vaguely legitimate arguments I have heard against E-passports is that they might permit someone two feet away from you to learn that you are American and blow you up, or permit someone two feet away to learn whatever might be stored on the E-passport," said Michael Shamos, a professor who specializes in security issues at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh."It's a balancing of risks. The E-passport will be much more difficult to forge and thus ought to reduce the prospect of terrorists getting hold of valid ones," he said.
To which there are several very valid opposing points.
First - considering the length of time we spend waiting in airports, it is certainly possible for any number of people to pass within 2 feet of us while we are there. Think of the hundreds of people you might pass closely while dashing through O'Hare to catch your next flight. An identity thief could have a field day grabbing tons of information from travelers.
Second - since passports may be used when the chip is "broken" his argument about forged passports becomes ridiculous. The only way RFID's can cut down on forgeries is if you make it mandantory for the RFID to be in working order when the passport is used. Otherwise, it's just like forging any other passport. All they have to do is grab someone's passport, break the chip and either reuse it in a forged passport or change out the picture to the person who will now be using it.
Making things more complex seldom makes them safer, it simply provides many more people with jobs and makes everyone else miserable. Such is government.
Happy travels.
Posted by: Teresa in
Current Affairs
at
01:59 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 689 words, total size 4 kb.
December 27, 2006
Since the outgoing set is always so loose, I have to wonder if they change shape along with moving the teeth. Interesting thought. In any case. Nothing really new today. In 2 weeks I see the dentist for the first checkup and I get my next 3 sets of liners.
I'm still brushing and flossing like mad. So far the most annoying thing is that I have to change my style of eating. For Christmas I made a lovely Cranberry Pecan pie - a recipe that Jill was gracious enough to send me. Usually I eat dinner and then wait a while to eat any dessert. But now I face a dilemma.
I can eat dinner and not have pie.
I can eat dinner and then run up - brush and floss, put the Invisilines back on, take them out to eat pie later and do the brush/floss thing again.
I can eat dinner, leave the Invisiline's out then eat pie later.
Or I can eat dinner, eat pie, then go brush/floss.
I'm going with the last one because the first 3 just don't work for me - especially the one that has me leaving them out for several hours. I don't like eating that much food at once, but there it is.
Good thing I don't make dessert very often.
Posted by: Teresa in
It's The Teeth
at
12:46 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 272 words, total size 1 kb.
He had one of the toughest jobs an incoming President has ever had. Put the country back together again. That he was never accorded the appreciation he deserved in life is sad. May his legacy be the better for it.
Pajamas Media has much more.
Posted by: Teresa in
at
12:32 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
December 24, 2006
The player (me) must list 3 things that I would love to get for Christmas. Then I must list 3 things that I definitely do not want to get for Christmas. Then I tag 5 friends and list their names. The one I tag needs to write on their blogs about their Christmas wishes then tag 5 more people. They must also clarify all the rules. When you tag someone you need to leave a comment that says “you’’ve been Christmas tagged!” in their comments and tell them to read your blog.
This is tough since I seldom think in terms of things I want for gifts. I guess I'll have to be outrageous because nothing is coming to mind.
Three things I would love to get for Christmas
1) A new sofa for the living room, so I could move the leather sofa to the tv room, so I could get rid of the highly uncomfortable love seat we have in front of the television right now.
2) A couple of new laptops to mess about with - one with a Linux OS the other with a Mac OS - just for grins and giggles and cause it would be fun to mess about with different stuff.
3) A cell phone repeater - because we get very bad cell reception at our house. It would be nice to look at the phone and see 4 bars instead of 0-1.5
Three things I don't want for Christmas
1) I like Kate's answer of a robe - I have several and I never wear them.
2) Jewelry, I forget to wear it.
3) knick-knacks - at the moment I have no where to put them
I'm not going to tag anyone because it's Christmas Eve and it's kinda late to be asking anyone else about what they might want.
Posted by: Teresa in
FUN
at
10:32 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 324 words, total size 2 kb.
December 23, 2006
To everyone who celebrates the season A Very Merry Christmas.
Posted by: Teresa in
Life Stuff
at
07:30 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.
December 21, 2006
*** I meant to post this yesterday and naturally forgot all about it when I couldn't do it right that minute. Forget fixing the teeth, I need a memory overhaul.
Posted by: Teresa in
FUN
at
04:12 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
December 20, 2006
Invisilines sets are changed every 2 weeks making this the start of week 2 of set 2. This second set seems to have loosened up considerably faster than the first set, or I got used to this set faster. New this week: the inside of my mouth is not too happy, it's a bit sore. This is my own fault as I can't seem to stop myself from constantly messing about with them.
Well, you know, they are on my teeth and my brain refuses to accept that they are necessary, so I tend to create a vacuum in my mouth - this causes the one unanchored side to move around a little bit. It also causes some rubbing on the inside of my mouth. Can't wait to hear what the dentist has to say about that. I can almost hear the "don't do that" now. Uh - sure - just remind me every 10 seconds or so.
Dinner time is the only time I leave them off for an extended period (about an hour) so I can eat and then have a cup of tea. I notice they take a few minutes to settle back into place after that length of time. Otherwise there are no fitting issues.
When I have them out now, my teeth are so weirdly aligned I can't close my mouth properly. I prefer to have them in giving me a proper "bite" when closing my mouth. When they're out I'm afraid I'll hurt a couple of teeth on top and bottom that now clash against each other. This shall pass, but it's a bit awkward for eating.
I do find a little trouble talking sometimes. My tongue occasionally gets things wrong and I stumble over a word when it sticks to the bottom set. After a few "blah,blah,blah's" I can carry on talking. (we'll leave off trying to decide whether I ever have anything of more value to say than "blah,blah, blah")
I have noted one interesting thing this week. I switched toothpaste. Well, I do that in any case, I am not wedded to a single brand, or I should say I wasn't. I do have to use toothpaste for sensitive teeth. Last time I went shopping for a tube of toothpaste, the only Sensitive tooth type they had was Crest for Sensitive Teeth with added scope. I picked it up while I was thinking about it.
I started using it and the tube itself was being very annoying. There is no way with the material they used to make the toothpaste tube, to squeeze the stuff up from the bottom. No matter how I try, the tube squishes every which way. I hate that!
Therefore, a couple of days ago, after being aggravated once too often, I went to another store and picked up a tube of Sensodyne. This one does not have an insane design that keeps me from squeezing the paste out of the tube. That's when I discovered an interesting side result. (the Crest tube is only half empty and has been relegated to another drawer for emergencies) Now I don't have a bad taste on my teeth when I remove the Invisilines for eating or to brush before bed.
Maybe I should rephrase that, it wasn't a "really bad" taste. Stale... might be a good word. Rather like your mouth in the morning. In this case, it was easily rinsed away, but it was always there when I took the things out. I'm not finding that with the Sensodyne toothpaste. Maybe it's my mouth chemistry at work and someone else might have a different result. In any case, I think I'll stick with the Sensodyne.
So, that's tooth blogging for the week. We aim to be a total entertainment blog here.
Posted by: Teresa in
It's The Teeth
at
06:45 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 665 words, total size 4 kb.
Dear me, how do you respond to someone who calls you a fool and an imbecile? I must necessarily be both because I blog and I read blogs.
Naturally I am chastened by his opinion of me. I had to read on. I want to understand my shortcomings and try to correct them.
Looking closely at the opinion I was struck by the following:
The blogs are not as significant as their self-endeared curators would like to think. Journalism requires journalists, who are at least fitfully confronting the digital age. The bloggers, for their part, produce minimal reportage. Instead, they ride along with the MSM like remora fish on the bellies of sharks, picking at the scraps.
I will direct his attention to bloggers such as Michael Yon and Bill Roggio. It's hard to get more directly involved in "reporting" the story than to embed with our troops in a war zone. There are a number of others who have taken the time and made the effort to do independent reporting on issues, but Mr. Rago apparently hasn't read them, therefore they do not exist.
He is correct in pointing out most bloggers, myself included, do not make any attempt at independent reporting. He does not seem to notice, we do not call ourselves "reporters" either. Bloggers would be quite happy to tell Mr. Rago we are offering our opinion. Last time I checked, this was not a crime, even if you are not being paid by a newspaper when you give said opinion.
It has totally escaped his notice that blogs provide yet another service for interpreting the "complex journalism" presented to us. Namely, bloggers, with expertise in many and varied fields. They are able to weigh in and provide insight into stories being handed out by journalists as "news" giving us necessary details to which we would not otherwise have access.
Anyone remember Rathergate? Within an extremely short period of time, Charles at Little Green Footballs used his expertise in fonts, to discredit the story. In the pre-internet era, this story would have stood without argument. The few people with expertise to call it a fake would have had little or no access to the media to bring it out into the open.
If we extrapolate from his narrative, Mr. Rago does not believe this type of information is necessary, it's not clear if that's because journalists have editors or if it's because journalistic writing is more "complex", complexity naturally outweighs facts.
Conservatives have long taken it as self-evident that the press unfavorably distorts the war, which may be the case; but today that country is a vastation, and the unified field theory of media bias has not been altered one jot.
In case you are wondering what "vastation" means, we have the definition from dictionary.com.
Vastation\Vas*ta"tion\, n. [L. vastatio, fr. vastare to lay waste, fr. vastus empty, waste.] A laying waste; waste; depopulation; devastation. [Obs.] --Bp. Hall.
Ah, once again we are shown the marvelous complexity of the journalistic mind. I find myself feeling like a commonplace little note scrawler, but I digress.
Vastation is not a word in popular use (which is why I provide you with the definition), it is the root of the word devastation, so even without a dictionary we can come close to its meaning. I must assume he is attempting to sound superior to us poor fools and imbeciles because there is no good reason for using this word. "Iraq is a wasteland" would have been just as easy to write. But, hey, it loses the superior sound, not to mention it's demonstrably untrue.
Perhaps he should read, Iraq's Economy Is Booming in Newsweek. He might have heard about it, if he paid attention to bloggers, because they have been spreading the story.
Oh my, another thing bloggers will do, disseminate information others might not have seen. Is there no end to the interference caused by these pesky fools?
I'm sure there are other things in the piece that could be pulled out and examined more closely, but there is no point. After the blog swarms that have erupted when others have condemned bloggers, I think he'll be vastly disappointed in the response to his opinion piece. He released it a few days before Christmas, most bloggers won't give him the time of day. As for me, I find it an amusing piece. I imagine the old journalists said the same thing about radio and television back in the day. Nothing makes you sound old and dated faster than trying to dismiss new technology.
Mr. Rago is entitled to his opinion on blogs and bloggers. Like everyone else, his opinion is worth the pixels it's printed on. That must be so galling for him.
Posted by: Teresa in
Current Affairs
at
12:58 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 801 words, total size 5 kb.
December 19, 2006
Tommy didn't have enough time (what with life constantly interfering with his writing) to finish his novel in November, but he's been slowly posting chapters as he gets them written. Head over here and start reading. This would be the last chapter currently, but he has links to the earlier Chapters at the top of the post. (yes read them in order) I wish my attempt had turned out half as well as this story.
Grab a cup of coffee, sit back and prepare to enjoy - it's an excellent, fun story so far. And no, it has nothing to do with Christmas - it's just that so many people have extra days off about now I thought they should be filled with some good reading. Have fun.
Posted by: Teresa in
Books
at
05:32 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 160 words, total size 1 kb.
1.Wrapping paper or gift bags? Envelopes? No? Okay then bags, I have a serious dislike of wrapping paper, can't make it look nice.
2.Real tree or artificial? Love the smell of a real tree, but I'm more comfortable with artificial.
3.When do you put up the tree? Thanksgiving Friday.
4.When do you take the tree down? Weekend after New Year.
5.Do you like eggnog? Nope never have.
6.Favorite gift you received as a child? Guess it has to be the doll I got when I was a year old. I still have it. My parents were not into getting us what we asked for, they were into getting us what they wanted to get us. Don't remember ever receiving a gift I asked for, which made me stop writing letters to Santa early on... as I recall I gave up after the third time.
7.Do you have a nativity scene? Yes, it's not up this year, don't have anywhere to put it.
8.Hardest person to buy for? My parents. One is blind, one is deaf and they don't go anywhere, nor do they need knick-knacks.
9.Easiest person to buy for? Any child under the age of 5.
10.Mail or email Christmas cards? Mail. Always late, but I get cards out almost every year.
11.Worst Christmas gift you ever received? Pick a year... My mom had (since she doesn't shop anymore) a real knack for picking out some really horrid sweater or socks or pajamas every year. She thought they were cute. Yes, they were accepted with a Thank you.
12.Favorite Christmas movie? The Desk Set, Katherine Hepburn and Spenser Tracy.
13.When do you start shopping? I'm always late - never get to it before Thanksgiving. I have been known to do all my shopping on Christmas Eve day.
14.Have you ever recycled a Christmas present? No
15.Favorite thing to eat at Christmas? It used to be my grandmother's chocolate chip cookies, but now that she's gone, so is the "recipe" which consisted of a pinch of "this" and a "touch" of that. I've never been able to make them like she did and she could never tell me what she did.
16.Clear lights or colored on the tree? Doesn't matter - variety is good, mixing it up each year.
17.Favorite Christmas song? Silent Night in English and German
18.Travel at Christmas or stay home? Stay at home - this will be the first Christmas in 23 years we've been able to stay home. Nothing is worse than traveling at Christmas.
19.Can you name all of Santa’s Reindeers? Yes.
20.Angel on the tree top or a star? Once again - doesn't matter - variety is good.
21.Open the presents on Christmas Eve or morning? All the years we were with the family at Christmas, we did one family set of gifts on Christmas Eve the other set on Christmas morning... then a third set when we finally got back to our own house a few days later.
22.Most annoying thing about this time of year? The constant Christmas music everywhere.
23.Do you have Jebus in your heart this Christmas? I can't say it better than blog sis QW "Usually when I am reading his blog" yep that's about right.
24.What would you like for Christmas? Snow might be nice. A White Christmas is a wonderful thing here in the forest.
Now I'm supposed to tag 5 people...
How about Mrs_Who
Because now her husband is blogging...Bitterroot
Blog father Harvey because he needs something to do.
Then I think Caltechgirl should have some fun with this.
And Rave because her life has been so boring lately ;-)
Tiny update: I realized I left off the link to the Jebus blog... sorry bout that Jebus ;-)
Posted by: Teresa in
FUN
at
04:51 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 646 words, total size 4 kb.
December 18, 2006
Posted by: Teresa in
FUN
at
09:09 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
Notice anything peculiar? Yeah, even though the US did not sign the "all important" Kyoto, our CO2 emissions have dropped dramatically since 2000 while the EU's have risen considerably. If you will note, these numbers are courtesy of the United Nations, not an American - anti-global warming group.
The opinion piece that goes along with the graph above is interesting reading, most especially this bit...
The number of firms moving manufacturing work to countries without emissions caps, such as China and India, will only grow.
Once again let us note that two of the most populous countries in the world have NO EMISSIONS CAP! None.
So here's the deal. Quit griping about the US and its failure to totally eliminate CO2 emissions across the country. Because that would be what you're doing. This country has dropped it's emissions at an eye-popping rate. All without the aid of signing onto Kyoto.
Oh, I forgot, this means the greenies will be very afraid their money will be cut. They aren't going to like it and they will start spouting nonsense about the numbers. In their book the US is the root of all "evil" in the world. Since they manage to overlook the huge amounts of polution put out by every other country in the world, I would have to say that their agenda is not to clean up the globe. Their agenda is to attempt to crush the United States. After all isn't that what you do to "evil"?
Posted by: Teresa in
Current Affairs
at
08:29 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 270 words, total size 2 kb.
December 17, 2006
It seems that everything "simple" is set up for you to type the name and address in directly. I refuse to retype something I already have in a database that is certainly usable. I'm stubborn that way.
Yes labels are a must if the post office is to be able to deliver them. I don't write enough anymore to have neat handwriting for more than 2 maybe 3 cards, then it all goes to hell.
Now I have to get back to placing my illegible scrawl on the cards... if only I could print out a signature line. But if I can't get labels to print on given label templates - I'll never get a signature to print on different sized cards. Sadly, after all this, I will never remember what I did for next year. I'm not even sure I remember it right now and I just did it.
*** Note to self: Make notes in the Treo ***
UPDATE: Well, I've gotten nearly all of my cards out and mailed. I have about 5 more requiring something special (since these are going to family I'm not too worried about them) - they will go out tomorrow. Whew! Nearly done.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
11:52 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 297 words, total size 2 kb.
December 15, 2006
So let me see what I can come up with:
1) The summer between 5th and 6th grade we had a tiny fire in our house. We were about to go on vacation, my parents were finishing up with packing the car and last minute details. My sisters and I were hanging out in the basement (my parent's house has the garage under the house, so we were waiting down there to get in the car) when my father came running down the stairs. This was astounding as I don't think I ever saw my father run up until that time.
My mom had been using the dishwasher and we aren't sure what happened, but the motor caught on fire. My dad came tearing down to throw the circuit breaker. They were able to get the fire out, it was that small, but my dad called the fire department to check it out before we left. The fire department asked if we would mind them using this as an exercise for the men... so we ended up with two fire trucks and a whole bunch of fully geared fire fighters at our house. What fun. My parents had to buy a new dishwasher when we got back. They always said "what if we had left before the fire started!" To this day I will not leave the house with a major appliance running.
2) My mother somehow associated me and the color pink. She dressed me in pink dresses, painted the bedroom pink with pink bedspreads that I shared with my sister, and even bought me a pinkish colored bike. I always hated pink with a passion which she dismissed with the statement "but pink is a good color for you". I no longer want anything to do with pink. For some reason, my other sister always got to wear blue, which was my favorite color, my youngest sister wore yellow, she had darker skin so it worked for her.
3) I have almost no knick-knacks in my house. Not that I dislike them. At first it was because I knew my kids would break anything reachable. Nowdays everytime I look at buying some cute little thing to put in my house, the first thing I think of is - how much dust will this collect? Then I try to decide if the object is worth the cleaning time. Most often the answer is no - so I only have a few things that people have given to me over the years, none that I've bought for myself.
4) I wore saddle shoes until I was in 6th grade. My mother insisted they were better for my feet. Finally I was able to talk her into a pair of penny loafers like the other girls were wearing. To my mother's everlasting surprise, I walked much better in the loafers than in the saddle shoes. I have very high arches and the ties across the top of my feet were painful. This meant I would bend my feet as little as possible when walking, so I walked rather flat footed. With the loafers I finally got a pair of shoes that let my foot bend without causing pain. Amazing how much better a person walks when their feet don't hurt. Even now, I can only wear tie shoes while walking around, if I sit down with tie shoes on (even tennis shoes) my toes go to sleep.
5) As a child, I could not sleep at night if it was raining outside. My mother told us kids the story of how my father slept through a tornado when they were living in their first house, long before we were born. The tornado demolished the garage and my dad never woke up. I figured the only way I'd make it through a tornado was if I was awake to get everyone else up. On rainy nights I'd lay in bed, wide awake, straining my ears for that "freight train" sound. It took me years to stop worrying when there were storms predicted. I never enjoyed the rain unless it was daytime and I could see the sky and know that nothing bad was headed my way.
And there you have it. Five things you might not have known about me. I would tag some people, but I think they'd shoot me. So, if you want to play, go right ahead and steal this. Just let me know and I'll link you.
Posted by: Teresa in
FUN
at
12:54 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 806 words, total size 4 kb.
Here's the closest I can get to cake with kitties.
Posted by: Teresa in
FUN
at
06:11 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
December 14, 2006
Excellent! A very steep drop after years of increases.
SAN ANTONIO - U.S. breast cancer rates plunged an unprecedented 7 percent in 2003, the year after millions of women stopped taking menopause hormones when a study showed the pills raise the risk of tumors.
.
.
.
Cases dropped most among women 50 and older — the age group taking hormones. The decline was biggest for tumors whose growth is fueled by estrogen — the type most affected by hormone use.
You would think this would immediately be big HUGE news. After all, everyone knew about the big study that was suddenly pulled and all those women dropping HRT like hot potatoes. But this wasn't the case.
When the 2003 numbers were first released a few months ago, they were grouped with 2001 and 2002 and portrayed as a leveling off of breast cancer after decades of steady rise. The big single-year drop was not pointed out."You don't want to overinterpret one point" without knowing whether it is a trend, said Kathy Cronin, a National Cancer Institute statistician who worked on the new analysis.
I'd take her words at face value, except for the fact that we've all seen too much statistics manipulation over the years. Environmentalists use this all the time - fix the stats so they don't show any improvement - keep people worked up by saying things aren't improving we have to work harder (ie. donate more money).
A culture of doom and gloom in this country keeps us from even attempting to celebrate victories. This is a victory. Many women are not going to have to go through the torture of treating cancer. Many women will live to see their grandchildren grow up. As Pam notes:
While there are more Red Hatters waxing their upper lips and sweating profusely in the checkout lane, there are also more of us to spoil our grandchildren.
I think news like this should be shouted from the rooftops. After all - women want to know what they are doing is making a difference! It's nice to know that once in a while we win and things improve.
Posted by: Teresa in
Medical
at
01:37 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 373 words, total size 2 kb.
Holy crap - I've never heard of such a thing. I've never had a meter reset by the power company. Maybe this is a Florida thing - I don't know.
However, when I started to comment I realized it would be a long one, so I decided to create a post on it instead.
See, if they would call to warn me, I could at least go unplug my cranky printer, which just does not like getting cut off at the power source. Every few months when Blinky does their thing, something goes haywire with the printer, and the stupid thing won’t fire back up.
Computer equipment is touchy stuff. It doesn't like sudden power outages and it doesn't like fluctuations. Power cycles like that tend to make these things either cranky or just kill them altogether.
Everyone, including people who use laptops, should invest in some sort of surge protector(s). You may need one or two, depending on what you have in the way of "stuff", but every piece should be plugged into a surge protector first. (they make tiny portable ones for laptops and travel - you can get them at Radio Shack for about $12 or so. Get the best you can afford - even a cheap one is better than nothing.
Now if you have intermittent, surprise power outages, then it would be worthwhile to invest in a UPS (Uninteruptible Power Supply). Basically a big battery. Most of the smaller ones will give you about 10 minutes worth of power allowing you to gracefully shut things down if the power stays off, they are also a type of surge protector. So, if you use one of these along with another surge protector, you have double the chance of catching outrageous fluctuations.
In our other house, we had wild power swings that would sometimes mess up our electronic ceiling fan, to the point it had to be reset. Yet in all that time, I never had a piece of computer equipment fail on me - because I had everything double protected and sometimes triple protected. In 9 years there, I never had to buy something because the electronics failed on me. I had other things go wrong - but never a blow-out because of electricity.
If you think of the cost of a computer or a printer, or anything else you might have to buy over and over again. If you think about internet time lost because your modem has been fried. Surge protectors and UPS's turn into a good investment rather than end up as a useless expense.
Everyone has power fluctuations. And good electronic equipment does not like that. Poke around online, find places that sell them and look at prices. Most people don't need top of the line - they need bottom of the line with enough outlets to plug in everything they want to run through it. For instance - I have a Tripp-Lite UPS like this one which cost me about $60. I have all my networking stuff plugged into surge protectors and then into this. I also have one of these fancy surge protectors with the extra wide slots for those honkin' big plugs so many electronics have. Plus the straight sets with 8 outlets.
Check Circuit City, Best Buy, computer stores for one you can carry home with you, or get online and have one delivered - stay out of the stores during the holiday rush. But don't let your electronics sit flapping in the electronic storm. Protect them and they will last you for a very long time.
Posted by: Teresa in
WebTech
at
11:01 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 631 words, total size 4 kb.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.
