May 07, 2012
Customer Service
Last week I was attempting to pay a bill online. Oh the joy - right? I don't do auto payments because I want to check the bills as they come in and be sure they are correct before money changes hands. It usually works out well.
One particular website has recently undergone an update. It's pretty. It is not functional. The update (whatever they did) will not allow me to copy/paste my password into the account login page.
You see I use
1Password. I love 1Password. One of the things I can do on every other site is log in without having to type my credentials. That's why I have it. Currently I'm not using the 1Password plugin on my browser as it is
giving me problems. Therefore, I'm not even trying for a 1-Click login here,
just a copy/paste.
This particular site... no go. I tried using my Mac with Firefox and Safari. I tried using my Win7 with Firefox. None of them allowed me to copy/paste on the login page. Very annoying.
So I did what I always do when I find a problem. I emailed them to let them know. These things happen, but nothing gets fixed if you don't tell them there is a problem.
I filled out the contact form. Described the problem. Told them what computers/OS/browsers I used and sent it off. That was last week.
Today I received the following email from them:
Hello,
This appears to have been resolved, correct?
BTW - that omits nothing. The person did not address me by name, even though they replied to my email and my contact info was in the reply. And best of all, they didn't even sign it!!! How delightful!
This is a major corporation. Wow! Okay.
I went back to their website and checked. No the problem still exists. I responded, that this was the first communication I had received and no the problem has not been fixed.
Whoever it is, still not signing a name, now tells me they have passed it on to the IT staff and they are sorry for any inconvenience.
I expect another email from the IT staff next week saying
Hello,
This appears to have been resolved, correct?
Because I can see they are all about the communication with their customers.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
12:16 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 387 words, total size 3 kb.
May 01, 2012
Reverse Annoyance
I wish there was a way to use a cattle prod response to telemarketers so they cease and desist without any extra effort on my part (I'm lazy). The latest annoyance comes to us by way of the March of Dimes.
Certainly a worthy organization, I have donated to them. In their little world this means they need to put me on a call list to brow beat me for even more money. *sigh* Not just a call list, but a robo-call list where they robo-dial my number several times a day and then don't answer. Not sure what the goal is here, but there must be logic in it somewhere.
So I see the return number on caller id 914-294-2161. At first I had no idea who MOD was since that is the "name" on the caller id. After doing a google search of the number I find the culprit. I always try to find who is calling first. I don't call back illegal operations like the shady lenders and credit card scammers. They are already breaking the law and they don't care what you think about their calling habits.
It's a charity, which means I call back. The same applies to political callers. They can call as often as they want until I tell them to stop. But once I tell them, they do stop. However, they don't always make it easy.
I therefore proceed to call the number back and... I get a fast busy signal. Oh goody. That means I can't get my number off their stupid list using an easy "please press 3 to have your number removed". More looking...
Back to the google search - I see other people have dialed the number back and they do get through, but I'm not going to waste my time redialing endlessly. Nor will I call back other numbers people have reported since that might not get me off the telemarket list or might put me on another one. Telemarketing is a tricky business.
That leaves me with only one option. I looked up the National March of Dimes and called them. They were nice about it (and so was I) All I had to do was tell the man who answered "I'd like to have my phone number removed from your telemarketing calls". He connected me to someone who took my name and phone number. She told me it would be 24 hours which is standard.
All that work, just to get my number off a list. *sigh* I like it so much better when I don't have to talk to anyone - just give me a way to get off the list automatically. Oh well, better than listening to the ringing as they call over and over and then don't answer.
But I still wish for that cattle prod type of responder to companies that use robo-dialers.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
11:57 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 484 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Oh, I would
love one of those. Imagine how effective it could be!
Lacking a cattle prod, I usually just block the numbers from my home phone after they call (my iPhone doesn't give that option, alas). There is a limit to how many I can block, so every few months I have to delete them all and start over, but that at least keeps them down to a minimum. Much simpler than trying to get your name off of someone's list.
Posted by: Julie at May 01, 2012 12:53 PM (+YPCX)
2
Actually Julie - I have found that calling back places like charities and political organizations is the best way to do it. Oddly enough - one call (some political org) was all it took to cut the calls down to 1/3. It's when I donate to a new place that I get put on their list (irritating - I already donated now you want more!!!). So I am down to maybe about 3 of the illegal type calls a week for the most part. Give it a try - far easier than lists of blocked calls! And better to get them off your cell phone altogether!!!
Posted by: Teresa at May 01, 2012 02:12 PM (qZOzE)
3
BTW - with most charities and pol groups just calling the number back gets you an auto "take me off the list". March of Dimes is an exception and therefore rated an irate post
Posted by: Teresa at May 01, 2012 02:16 PM (qZOzE)
4
I never call them back, they get added to this gizmo we have that blocks their stupid asses. "Person 2 Person" it's called, I think. Old thing but we used to add all the time and now we get very few calls at home, but some via cell. The cell ones I add to silent "ringtone" contact groups named "Jerks," "Spam," etc. Heh.
Posted by: Sheri at May 02, 2012 09:50 AM (7FREh)
5
I'd love that Person 2 Person thing for the illegal calls and the ones with no call back number. That would be awesome. And I always did like your idea of a silent ringtone for spam cell phone callers.
Posted by: Teresa at May 02, 2012 01:27 PM (qZOzE)
6
I dropped my land line many years ago. I'm on the national cell no-call list, and it works. I never receive a call from anyone I don't know, unless it's a mis-dial wrong number. 99.99% of the calls I receive are from people I know and want to talk to. You can fix that problem, I did.
Posted by: Yabu at May 06, 2012 10:09 AM (EZynn)
7
Yabu - when we moved here we stepped back in time by about 15 years. The cell service here is about non-existent and all over the state it is very iffy in many spots because of the hills and trees that block the signals. God forbid they build more towers - everyone has a meltdown. They love living in the stone age here. Very odd for a place that thinks it's soooo cosmopolitan, hip, and with it.
We have a mini-cell tower in the house now, but that is dependent on the cable/electricity being up and active. If my cable or electric go out (and I have no landline), I have to drive 2 miles down to a farm stand to get a signal good enough to call and report a problem. (then the cable company would try to upsell me their cable phone... ARG!) Plus, until we got service back we'd be without emergency phone service... I don't like that idea much.
I consider our 2 different phones - land line and cell - are backup communications so to speak. The land line also has far better quality and direct 911 service. If it goes down (very very seldom happens) we have the cell phones available.
Therefore we put up with the annoyances because it's a fallback feature. One day I'm sure that will change, but for now, it's working for us
Posted by: Teresa at May 06, 2012 10:43 AM (qZOzE)
8
Teresa, sweetie pie...you're a northern country girl. I love it!!!
By the by, I just fired up my new Mac...very cool. Star Trek cool.
Posted by: Yabu at May 06, 2012 01:17 PM (fyuN7)
Posted by: Teresa at May 06, 2012 01:49 PM (qZOzE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 30, 2012
Still Here
Pulled a muscle or something in my neck while I was sleeping the other day (btw how does that happen? Weird!). Kinda ruins my whole "let's sit at the computer and see how many words we can type" attitude. Heh.
If you want to see some pics from the last week, head over to my
Posterous page where they've been stacking up. (It's very easy to post pics over there which is why I've been neglecting the extra work it takes to post them here).
Otherwise, more later once my neck stops hurting.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
10:40 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 95 words, total size 1 kb.
April 22, 2012
Can you say: Chicken Little!
Okay, okay, maybe I'm being just a
leetle snarky, but there are times when I want to tell the news media to just "get a grip people!".
I've seen the following story floating about for the last couple of days. This morning a friend emailed the following:
Hundreds of thousands may lose Internet in July
In a nutshell, here is what happened:
Hackers infected a network of probably more than 570,000 computers worldwide. They took advantage of vulnerabilities in the Microsoft Windows operating system to install malicious software on the victim computers. This turned off antivirus updates and changed the way the computers reconcile website addresses behind the scenes on the Internet's domain name system.
First let's take a deep breath. A little over half a million computers
world wide is a mere drop in the bucket. It's miniscule. However, if you are one of those people who never do updates on your system and therefore have every drive-by virus and trojan known to man, you have far more problems than whether or not you can get online come July.
For those who want to check their systems because they are worried, you can find a nice handy
instruction pdf via the FBI that will walk you through checking your system. Although this is a windows problem for the most part, if you get your DNS addresses served up via a router on your network, you'll want to check your DNS even if you're using an Apple or Linux box. The pdf linked above includes instructions on checking your Mac too.
I remember when this first happened. As I recall, there were a number of businesses who had gotten infected. Because it was difficult, for whatever reason, for these businesses for fix their DNS, the FBI set up the safety net DNS for a while to give them time to clean up their systems (sorry... it wasn't because the home user would have problems... that's basically a non-issue for them). So now they are warning these same businesses that the safety net is going to be dropped and they better get on the ball and get things fixed soon.
The thing that bugs me about how this is all presented is this type of statement:
For computer users, a few mouse clicks could mean the difference between staying online and losing Internet connections this summer.
This is so irritating because you
DO NOT lose internet connection! The connection is there, it does not go away. What you lose is the "address book" of the internet.
The DNS (Domain Name Server) is the place where your computer goes to find "where exactly is www.yahoo.com?" When your computer asks this, the DNS computer says "today you can find it at 98.139.183.24". And then your computer can go merrily along its way looking for that address. You don't have to remember a set of numbers. If Yahoo needs to change the numbers for some reason, all it has to do is tell the DNS server the new numbers. It's all fixed in the background without you having to even know about it. Makes browsing the web possible for everyone.
Honestly though, the whole "OMG!!! OMG!!! The internet will be killed!!!! OMG!!!" Is just a bit too over the top for me. Can we now get back to worrying about things that really are scary? Like running out of wine to drink with dinner or something... Sheesh!
Last of all. If you aren't using a service like
OpenDNS or even
GoogleDNS, then you should be. GoogleDNS provides only DNS service but it should be secure enough. I use OpenDNS but do not have an auto updater running, I set it up much like one would set up GoogleDNS. The links above are to the basic setup instructions for each.
The reason I use OpenDNS is that it provides DNS plus extra security. They blocked the Mac Flashback trojan well before Apple put out a fix for it. They also allow you to control what comes in over your home network if you want to set up a free account with them.
Either of these services is FAR better than most ISP DNS offerings. They are more secure and up to date. They also don't suffer from major outages like Comcast often experiences. So please think about changing how you get your DNS to your computer. It's well worth it. And if you have a very bad DNS provider, you'll find the web browsing way way faster.
Happy surfing.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
01:48 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 759 words, total size 5 kb.
1
For some unknown reason, my ISP's DNS goes troppo now and then. Or at least it used to; I have no idea what it does now, since I switched to OpenDNS, which has yet to fail me.
Posted by: CGHill at April 23, 2012 09:28 PM (Ysjpw)
2
My son has Comcast and he was texting me in despair one night while trying to get his homework done and his internet kept dropping out.
After talking to him and determining exactly what was happening, I changed him to OpenDNS and he has been delighted ever since. heh.
Posted by: Teresa at April 23, 2012 10:00 PM (qZOzE)
3
Chicken Little. What is OpenDNS? (I know I should Google it but you said to say Chicken Little and I guess that covers all my bases) And can I just say that I can't wait for the brains of our household to get back from playing in the sand so that I can go back to not caring how to be computer literate? ;P
Posted by: Lemon Stand at April 25, 2012 03:59 PM (JnntQ)
4
LS - LOL well, you can go to the opendns link and read how to change yours or you can wait a little while til your husband gets home and let him look at it
Posted by: Teresa at April 26, 2012 10:34 AM (qZOzE)
5
Received a Windows Secrets newsletter today that talked about this. If you are in the U.S. you can go to this website:
http://www.dns-ok.us/
Green is fine. Red means infected.
other languages are on this page (www.dcwg.org/detect/).
Thanks for your updates. I appreciate your posts when you give us a heads up.
Posted by: cin at May 03, 2012 11:21 AM (DBAeF)
6
Cin - thanks for the link. I vaguely saw it floating around, but after I wrote this post I kinda ceased really paying attention to it all
Posted by: Teresa at May 03, 2012 01:10 PM (qZOzE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 19, 2012
FUD of the Day
I follow a bunch of people on twitter and sometimes I wonder why. I won't say who posted this (since most people I know wouldn't be the least bit interested) but this was a retweet posted today:
RT @identityg: They change the rules all the time. Here's the latest on recent Facebook security updates! http://ow.ly/99ZFf #IDTheft
I don't follow identityg.
When I see something like this the first thing that pops into my head is... Well Damn!!! Facebook has changed its privacy policy or settings AGAIN. So what do I have to look for now??? What do I have to change?
And of course I go to check the link. Which turns out to be...
A story about how the Koobface gang and their servers were finally shut down. Oh yeah... and a warning that there is another trojan out there to take its place.
Really? That's what you've got? And you post a tweet saying "
They change the rules all the time." What am I missing? What rules changed? Where in the linked story do they tell me that facebook changed something so users have to check their accounts and fix them again?
Oh the story doesn't say that? Well then your tweet is FUD (Fear Uncertainty Doubt) to get people to read your article. Good going!
The people who tweet this crap and those who retweet it should be smacked - or unfollowed which is what I did (unfollowed not smacked much as I would love to find the person and do that - ha). That worked out well for them didn't it.
While the story itself is not a bad story - the hype to go read it is severely misleading. The bottom line... facebook has not changed anything and this presents nothing new when it comes to keeping your account secure. It's merely a news story about the shutdown of a gang - newsworthy yes, causing changes to your facebook account? Not at all.
So now that I have unfollowed the culprit in spreading the annoyance I shall return to my regular Sunday afternoon browsing.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
02:13 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 353 words, total size 2 kb.
February 05, 2012
Not So Super Anymore
I just finished watching my last Super Bowl (maybe even football game). This has been coming on for a while, but tonight I decided I've had enough.
We watched most of the game with the sound muted because the "National Call" is simply dreadful. They vacillate between one team and the other being "the best ever". They fawn over players to the point where you want to tell them to get a room from crap's sake. There's so much inane blather I want to throw things at the television. It's too much.
If one was at a bar where other things were going on it might be tolerable. But sitting at home with only the game on, it's too dreadful for words.
Sadly the radio call here is even worse. I have no idea where they got those two guys, but wow, bad doesn't even begin to describe it.
Of course then we have the game itself. It's so full of show off showboaters I cringe after nearly every play. So, a guy who makes a bazillion bucks tackles someone on the other team and he dances or does a little praying thing or points at the crowd, or flexes his biceps or whatever... Dude why are you showing off for doing your friggin' job??? It gets worse every year. Pretty soon we'll have entire teams out there doing some sort of salsa dance after every play. Just because the play is over and aren't they great...
Seriously?
What happened to the football games I used to watch with my dad all those years ago? The guys went out and did their job. If they won the game they celebrated. Otherwise they played the game. They didn't suck oxygen on the sidelines, they didn't dance in the end zone, and they didn't need a lawyer on the field to figure out which hits were okay and which were bad or did they really catch the ball or not.
Oh and let's not forget about the play reviews... why do we bother with refs on the field? Just have cameras do all the work. Now that the guys in stripes know every play will be reviewed they don't even watch well enough to make good calls - the on field mistakes happen more and more often. Of course it might help if the NFL would decide they want to be a professional sport and actually hire their refs full time... you know like other sports do.
I'll stick with hockey. It's way more fun to watch, the players are tough as nails and the local call is always good (no matter which team it is). Of course now that hockey is getting more attention with HD TV it may go the way of football and baseball and become completely unwatchable. I hope not, but I won't be surprised.
I guess then I'll have to see if I can find some Rugby to watch. Sheesh.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
11:38 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 497 words, total size 3 kb.
1
The best thing about the Super Bowl, for the last dozen years, has been the commercials. That is, until tonight's game, where the ads generally sucked.
Meh.
Posted by: Rev. Paul at February 06, 2012 12:08 AM (EJRAb)
2
Rev Paul. Even the commercials can't help it anymore... after all we can see them online before the game even begins. No point in wasting time just to see if anything marginally interesting turns up. heh.
Posted by: Teresa at February 06, 2012 12:22 AM (qZOzE)
3
I didn't watch. Besides, we are Pats fans and it had the potential to be a cardiac event with the boys, so I didn't want to deal with that. (When they aren't rooting for Tebow, they're rooting for the Pats. Lots of ex-UF players on that team...)
I'm all about the commercials, which I watch online. I've decided that year after year, Doritos makes the best commercials.
Posted by: Bou at February 06, 2012 07:00 AM (DkNsp)
4
As usual, it was the first and last professional football game I watched all year. I could care less.
Posted by: Yabu at February 06, 2012 11:40 AM (AML3h)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 01, 2011
Phone? Alrighty Then
Yes we have phone service. No power no cable, but the landline phone service is back. Of course if the generator is not running we have 2 phones that work (corded phones). One is upstairs the other in the basement. I won't be making mad dashes to answer.
Naturally I found out the phone was working by receiving a recorded political call. I immediately got my number removed from their list. Geeze. You'd think they would take the New England area codes off the list for a couple of weeks until people at least get power back. What idiots!
Well here's hoping we get power soon so things go back to normal. Or whatever passes for normal around here. Ha.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
11:17 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 123 words, total size 1 kb.
October 04, 2011
Waterlogged
Rain... yeah we got it... lots and lots of it. Not quite as much as they are getting in Peabody, MA where they had flooding, but enough to make me wonder when we will all turn into mushrooms.
It's supposed to be sunny tomorrow... we shall see. This ridiculous weather system has been hanging around for days now. However, it finally spurred me on to order a
rain gauge. I've been thinking about it for a while and today I finally searched around and found what I wanted. All manual, no electronics to break. I'm pretty sure I can figure out how to use it... meniscus and all.
I've been hitting up
wunderground to get really local rain totals, but after checking out the nearby weather stations registered with them, I find they are all over the place when it comes to rain amounts. Sadly, the closest station (just over the hill) has an obviously broken gauge. The other stations in the area have measured amounts between 0.3 and 0.6 inches of rain for today... theirs says 3.75... right. Somehow I just don't think so. And it's like that all the time. One of these days I want to check and see if they get any "rain" on a sunny day... now that would be fun.
So... soon people... very soon I shall be boring you senseless with rainfall and snowfall totals (oh yes, this gauge will do snow too! FTW!).
It doesn't take much to amuse me. Why do you ask?
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
08:14 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 253 words, total size 2 kb.
September 08, 2011
Was Going to Post Something...Yet Again
Must must must start writing this stuff down as I think of it because quite honestly after about 10 seconds I can't remember what the brilliant idea was anymore. Sheesh! Of course that might be a good thing...
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
09:38 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
1
There's that "brilliant flash of lightning" I mentioned the other day.
Posted by: Rev. Paul at September 08, 2011 04:23 PM (0DZhf)
2
LOL - Lightning would blind me.
Posted by: Teresa at September 08, 2011 09:05 PM (ithYH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 12, 2011
The Latest Catch Phrase
Well, it's been around for a few years, but it seems that lately I'm running into it more and more and it makes me want to scream. It's the
Give yourself permission to....
Fill in whatever blank you want after that.
Can I tell you how much I hate that phrase. I want to take the person, smack them, and say "I'm not 3 years old! I don't have to
give myself permission to do things!"
It's a cop-out, but oh so very easy for self-help types. They only have to say something like: all you need to do is "give yourself permission" and you'll be able to do "X" (whatever "X" might be). How easy is that!
If you can listen to that trite stupid phrase and then suddenly "X" is accomplished, they can say "see it works". If "X" doesn't work for you, they say "it's because
you aren't letting yourself do this".
Heads I win, tails you lose. I wonder how long we'll have to live with this particular bit of "wisdom" before someone finds a different catch phrase to snare the masses and sell their schtick. Geeze.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
10:10 PM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 195 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The subtext here is that we could all be Having A Great Time if we weren't such pissy little authoritarians, clamping down on anything that looks like fun.
This is, of course, horse doodles, dependent as it is on a universal definition of fun, which doesn't actually exist in our species. (Your dog wants steak, but he's easier to please.) How we got to a point where we believe anyone who hangs out his guru shingle is beyond me.
The wisdom of Dennis Miller: "I went to a bookstore and asked the saleswoman where the Self Help section was. She said if she told me it would defeat the purpose."
Posted by: CGHill at August 12, 2011 11:21 PM (naMhs)
2
I hate catchphrases. My biggest pet peeve lately is people who say: "Really, _____ (fill in the blank)? Really?" So fucking annoying.
Posted by: Erica at August 13, 2011 12:47 AM (PY2l4)
3
Thank you! I loathe that particular phrase.
Posted by: pam at August 13, 2011 08:11 AM (VZULe)
4
"Horse doodles" is a phrase I could definitely get into though.
Posted by: Erica at August 13, 2011 09:23 AM (PY2l4)
5
First thing I thought of reading the phrase was new age-y crap and how much I hate it. But then I immediately I felt a bad about hating on it all, so I thought, "I know! I should just give myself permission to hate on new-age-y crap." So I did, and, yeah, I feel waaaay better now.
Posted by: sheri at August 14, 2011 06:58 AM (nJv/i)
6
You all crack me up. Of course I'm guilty of using catch phrases myself - too much - and usually try to let them slide but this one seems to me rearing its ugly self all over lately so I hate it.
Sheri - I feel so much better too and I can now giggle about giving my self permission to hate it... excellent.
Posted by: Teresa at August 14, 2011 10:16 PM (xE2iU)
7
T, I'm LOLing at the spam comment just above. "My man!" I think I'm going to use that as a tag line on my site:
You must have something to say, you say style, my man!
WTF LOL WTF LOL WTF LOL <--- picture this being like "police line do not cross" tape across the bottom here
Posted by: sheri at August 15, 2011 06:22 AM (nJv/i)
8
Run with it Sheri! I love it... since that comment must go the way of its predecessors, I'm copying it down here because it's really classic:
Sometimes I just feel that people write, and do not really have much to
say. This isnot the case. You must have something to say, you say style,
my man! You certainly have an interesting way to attract people, and
with your video and your words. You have got quite a blog twelve punch!
Posted by: Teresa at August 15, 2011 08:29 AM (xE2iU)
9
Double-rainbow awesome advice!
:p
("horse doodles" ftmfw)
Posted by: Joan of Argghh! at August 15, 2011 12:44 PM (pwg4g)
10
If I gave myself permission at work the body count would be too high.
Posted by: Cappy at August 17, 2011 06:14 AM (KqcM+)
11
Cappy - we'll be there with shovels to help out...
Posted by: Teresa at August 17, 2011 10:54 AM (xE2iU)
12
I have to say, I've never heard that phrase. Seriously. I was trying to think if I heard anything remotely close to that at work and the closest I could come to is when I call the IT department and say, 'I can't get in. Can you get me permission?' That's it.
Posted by: Bou at August 17, 2011 10:40 PM (NZHwq)
13
Bou - I listen to lots of podcasts the "creative" types seem to use this phrase all the time. I have actually unsubscribed to podcasts when they fall back on this. Then I have been reading more since I got my Kindle and I've picked up a couple of books on the rec of people I really like - only to find... they fall back on this crap too. It seems to keep popping up more an more.
Posted by: Teresa at August 18, 2011 01:00 PM (xE2iU)
14
It must be because I hang out with analytical types then, that I've not heard this phrase. I was trying to figure out how YOU had heard it considering your business, but... listening to podcasts is the answer.
Posted by: Bou at August 18, 2011 09:30 PM (NZHwq)
15
Yeah, it's the photo podcasts (not all of them of course). And then I know a couple of writers who are wonderful people and I love reading their stuff. I've gotten a few books they've been reading and have mentioned... and there ya go. LOL.
Posted by: Teresa at August 18, 2011 10:32 PM (xE2iU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 01, 2011
If You Aren't Chatty Cathy...
Looks like the latest thing in the world of airport security is oft touted but outwardly ignored until now - "behavior watch".
New Security Measures Tested at Logan
The relevant bits:
Under the new program, behavior officers will ask passengers non-intrusive questions and look to see how passengers respond. Those who exhibit suspicious behavior like avoiding eye contract and struggling with answers will be pulled aside for more screening.
So there you go. Not having a great day? No sleep the night before a flight? Fight with your significant other just before leaving home? Well, suck it up and be prepared to have a nice little chat at the security checkpoint. If you don't you may miss your flight - which would be even more annoying.
While I think behavioral checks are the way to go on paper. I'm wondering how they will work in actual practice.
Grab your popcorn folks. Should be a fun show.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
10:36 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 161 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This stuff is getting out of control, for sure. The last TSA officer I spoke with had the education of a nine year old. I wanted to ask her if her mother fixed her lunch this morning. She was clueless. Before I could ask her, she said she had to "go on break". I kid you not.
Posted by: Yabu at August 02, 2011 10:23 AM (ezDPm)
2
The Israelis are past masters at this sort of thing. It's really a much more effective way to catch bad guys... only thing is, they use highly trained security people and our TSA uses folks that have the pay grade of supermarket baggers.
They're also not afraid to profile travelers in Israel. We have problems with profiling in this country despite the fact that terrorists tend overwhelmingly to come from certain ethnic/religious groups.
I see a disaster looming.
Posted by: Elisson at August 02, 2011 08:34 PM (L04gV)
3
I have this radical new idea for screening. Just hear me out.
First, you would look very closely at the people who did the crime(s) that set off all the extra screening, initially. (In this case, it might be, say, the actual "perpetrators" of the violence on September 11, 2001). You'd try to see if there was any common thread. Any sort of identifiable "pattern" present? Anything at all? Perhaps they're all of Middle-Eastern descent, and Muslim extremists, and between the ages of 18 and 35, and male, and have been responsible for similar acts of violence in other parts of the world in the past, both recently and further back? Something like that would go a long way toward identifying where extra "screening" might be needed.
Next, armed with this description and having narrowed the area where extra screening might be needed, you'd watch ESPECIALLY for people
matching that description, wherever they might be, not just in airports.
So far, so good, but here's the twist: if someone
matching that description is seen to be
acting suspiciously, law enforcement would:
... ask non-intrusive questions and look to see how they respond. Those who exhibit suspicious behavior like avoiding eye
contract and struggling with answers will be pulled aside for more
screening.
My idea was to call this process, "crimefighting" or "common sense," for short.
Completely crazy and un-doable, I know.
Posted by: sheri at August 03, 2011 04:37 AM (Dlmrk)
4
The real problem as everyone knows is "exactly who will they train to do the job?" So far we've seen so many incompetent people doing TSA work, it does not give me confidence that they would hire anyone able to do the job even marginally well. In various ways you have hit on every point where we will see problems. I really wonder if it will work at all.
Posted by: Teresa at August 03, 2011 09:39 PM (xE2iU)
5
I hope they don't ask me about my Obamatized 401K plan!
Posted by: JihadGene at August 05, 2011 12:22 PM (X19JV)
6
JG - you know they will now. LOL.
Posted by: Teresa at August 05, 2011 12:48 PM (xE2iU)
7
Great. I'm a dark-haired guy with a beard and the social graces of a scorpion with irritable bowel syndrome.
I'm so screwed.
Posted by: Harvey at August 05, 2011 08:19 PM (pTueD)
8
But we love you anyway Harvey... just take me along when you want to travel and I'll be able to tell them how awesome you are. LOL.
Posted by: Teresa at August 05, 2011 09:09 PM (xE2iU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 29, 2011
Filing
I really really have to figure out a new filing system. Or rather a new office configuration to make my filing easier. David Allen of
GTD fame was so so right when he said - anytime filing can not be done easily and immediately, it will pile up.
And thus I will spend a few hours this evening getting my filing done because I've been dumping papers in my closet... then telling myself I'll get it put away next chance I get.
Right.
Out of sight is out of mind. Well, until I walk in to set something down and the stack falls over.
Ha - serves me right for putting it off.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
01:06 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 114 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I hear you - and I have the same dislike for filing. I used to leave it for my secretary, but now that I work alone ...
sigh.
Easier to just do it as it occurs. Darn it.
Posted by: Rev. Paul at July 29, 2011 04:22 PM (0DZhf)
2
That's it!!! I need a secretary!!! I wonder who I could coerce... Um... ask nicely... to take up the position and if they'll do it for free, quietly, and then just leave. Heh.
Posted by: Teresa at July 29, 2011 10:20 PM (xE2iU)
3
I have less paper to file than ever, but now that it's mostly electronic filing, God bless that little entry box with the magnifying glass symbol.
Posted by: Bob at July 30, 2011 05:41 PM (nRsZr)
4
Bob I know I have less than I used to, but it's still there and it still needs to be filed and I really hate that because I'm lazy. LOL. But yes, I do love my online filing of stuff that is now non-paper.
Posted by: Teresa at July 30, 2011 07:43 PM (xE2iU)
5
I have a nice big stack of papers and important documents...somewhere.
Posted by: Mr. Bingley at August 01, 2011 07:11 AM (OXWdU)
6
Mr. Bingley - at least they haven't cascaded all over the floor in front of you... that's when you have to rethink the whole stack thing.
Posted by: Teresa at August 01, 2011 09:52 PM (xE2iU)
7
I'd like to get one of those foo-foo scanning systems where you scan everything in and it organizes it all and you basically go totally paperless after that. I looked into it once, but I need to get on it for real one of these days.
Posted by: sheri at August 06, 2011 09:19 AM (nJv/i)
8
I use my old slow scanner right now, but would love to get one of the fujitsu snapscans for this. Mine is just annoying. heh.
Posted by: Teresa at August 06, 2011 10:59 AM (xE2iU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 26, 2011
Mystery Water Revealed
Today the mystery water returned to the downstairs bathroom. This time with a difference. The shower tray was completely full of water. The floor was all wet, the closet was all wet, the unfinished room was all wet...
Time to call someone.
My husband suggested we start with the septic people instead of plumbers. They very quickly got someone out here (I was impressed - excellent service). And yes, it is the septic system.
It was full of water. Lovely.
First he had to pump it out - about 1500 gallons. Then he scoped it out with a camera. Turns out the pipe leading to the leach field had collapsed. Water goes in, can't get out. We don't know why - there is nothing heavy moving over that portion of the yard (even when the trees were taken down, they weren't near that section). They may figure it out when they dig it up, or it may remain a mystery.
Thursday they come back to replace that section of pipe. In the meantime I cleaned the bathroom, my husband got the unfinished part of the basement. We'll have to call in Service Master to do the carpets properly since they had water in certain areas. My husband did the shop vac to get rid of most of the water - but they should be properly treated.
As long as it's only the pipe with a problem, we'll have escaped pretty lightly. If they have to do anything to the leach field... well that would be a really big deal. We'll find out soon enough.
Are we having fun yet?
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
08:33 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 272 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Oh, that sounds wretched. I'll keep my fingers crossed that its only the pipe and nothing more!
Posted by: Julie at April 26, 2011 09:49 PM (FZVGP)
2
This is even worse than my broken toilet seat.
Posted by: Laura at April 27, 2011 05:28 AM (ua7hq)
3
Now, in sympathy, I'm afraid to poop.
Posted by: LeeAnn at April 27, 2011 07:21 AM (dioqO)
4
LOL @ LeeAnn!
Sorry this happened. It's always something, isn't it?
Posted by: pam at April 27, 2011 07:56 AM (i3Kno)
5
Just be glad the yard is dry enough for them to bring in the equipment they need - even if it's just laborers with shovels.
Posted by: Rev. Paul at April 27, 2011 09:02 PM (y+0ce)
6
Thanks all - especially LeeAnn who is going the extra mile (or not going as the case may be). So far it's dry enough - but it's supposed to rain hard tomorrow... of course. We'll see how it goes - took all day to get hold of the local dude to get the damned permit. ARG!
Posted by: Teresa at April 27, 2011 10:08 PM (xE2iU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 05, 2011
Ah If Only I Was Adept At the Quick Retort
A few weeks ago I was at a function manning a table. Various people from our group had done this over a two day period. That day it was my turn. Oh goody.
It's not my type of thing at all. I can be nice and polite, but basically it is a form of sales and thus I am not at all comfortable with it. When ever I do these things there is always one guy (always a guy) who has to walk up and go on the attack - so to speak. My problem is, they always take me unaware and I can never find a great or even good reply. That makes me even more angry than the original idiot comment(s) they make.
So this guy wanders up, looks at our banner, looks at me and says... "So why should I join your group?" Belligerently. I guess he wanted to see if I would jump up and immediately defend the group from... what? Him? Right. Sure thing. I'll get right on it...
He thought he was being very clever. I guess in some ways he was, I couldn't retaliate in that situation and he knew it, the jerk. I sat staring at him and all I could think was... "No you really can't tell him "we don't want you to join our group". No, don't do it. Even if he really does deserve it."
The problem was, while I was stuck trying not to say that, I couldn't think of anything else.
In the meantime one of the other guys from our group came back to the table. Those two proceeded to talk about various things involving work, computers, yada yada yada. After a while I finally figured out he was bored and looking for a conversation. That was his way of starting it. Good grief he was at least 65 years old - not six. In all these years he hasn't learned a single interpersonal skill. I was wondering if he was even employed.
How I wish I could come up with some withering retorts that sound unexceptional on the face of it. I guess it isn't meant to be.
Oh well, here's another pic of the horse from over the weekend.
He wouldn't like the guy either if they met. Heh.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
09:12 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 395 words, total size 2 kb.
1
"He wouldn't like the guy either if they met."
That's not a bad line. Reminds me of Groucho's famous answer to an invitation to join a country club: "I won't belong to any organization that would have me as a member."
Don't worry, T - the list of those who thought of a great line
later, after it was no longer needed, is a long one indeed.
Posted by: Rev. Paul at April 06, 2011 03:42 PM (0DZhf)
2
What a beautiful capture!! Stunning!
I never think of witty retorts until well after the incident. Sucks.
Love Groucho's quote... but I'd never remember it...
Posted by: pam at April 06, 2011 06:16 PM (i3Kno)
3
Well, there's always:
"I don't know.
I can tell you what our group does, but after that, you'll have to decide for yourself whether you should join and why."
Learned that one from a city bus driver in Vegas, who would say something along these lines to riders who would ask "is this the bus I want?" or "Should I be on this bus?".
Most entertaining bus ride ever, by the way.
Posted by: Harvey at April 10, 2011 07:40 PM (pTueD)
4
Well, the longer version of the story (the part I left out)... while he was being belligerent, he was holding forth on how all the places he goes he sees the same presentations and he wants to see something "new and different". I had to bite my tongue to keep from telling him I couldn't read his mind and therefore had no idea what he would consider to be "new and different". You'll notice at no time did he ever volunteer to join us and help create better meetings... no he'd like those handed to him so he doesn't have to be bothered.
Posted by: Teresa at April 10, 2011 10:25 PM (xE2iU)
5
I have had that happen. I'm not very good at sales. My standard line is, "You shouldn't" and I stand there smiling sweetly. Let them walk off... I don't want trouble makers in any group I'm involved with.
Posted by: Bou at April 13, 2011 08:47 PM (wEvt/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 18, 2011
Event Id 5782
For anyone who stumbles across this looking desperately for a fix. If it is in relation to a service like SMTP in IIS, the short answer is:
Go to Computer Management --> Services and check to be sure the service is not "disabled".
The long winded or winding story of the is answer is below the fold.
more...
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
11:39 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1076 words, total size 6 kb.
1
Dang! I must be a geek at heart. Sorry for your problem but fascinated reading about it. Posting a comment via 'Droid.
Is there a difference between a geek and a nerd?
Posted by: MGA at March 19, 2011 06:43 AM (bTVN0)
2
LOL - well at least one person didn't find it to be eye glazing. Thanks.
Posted by: Teresa at March 19, 2011 10:29 AM (xE2iU)
3
I know zilch about networks, but have had some luck (for that's what it is) working on PCs & their own set of problems. Those V-8 duh! moments come in handy ... I just wish they came in handy
sooner.
Posted by: Rev. Paul at March 19, 2011 11:49 AM (Oo5Fg)
4
Definitely
sooner would be better.
Posted by: Teresa at March 19, 2011 12:38 PM (xE2iU)
5
Whatever you do...don't use Linux, it'll throw you for a loop around the moon. Fact is, messing with the registry will throw you off the truck and under the bus. Anyway, I'm glad you got your problem solved.
Just sayin'
Did you see the moon tonight?
Posted by: Yabu at March 19, 2011 09:28 PM (RDdNW)
6
We didn't see the moon. I totally forgot! We went to Boston to see the Hockey East finals - which were excellent. Did lots of walking outside, but I seldom think to look for the moon when I'm in the city. Oh well.
Posted by: Teresa at March 20, 2011 01:16 PM (xE2iU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 14, 2011
Was Going to Post Something...Again
But ended up working until about an hour ago (that would be about 10:30pm). Now I'm too tired. My boss is still working and since I'm remoted into the session I'm still watching him try to tackle a very stubborn mail server. Gah there are days I hate computers.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
10:36 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Are you trying to run your mail server on Windows?
Posted by: Yabu at March 15, 2011 08:47 AM (RDdNW)
2
Not trying - we have been for years. The smtp service on the server decided to stop working.
As usual it is the sucky error messages that got us. Truly stupid error messages which were completely misleading.
But do not tell me to use Linux because all mail servers suck - every one of them. None of them work easily. All of them have issues. And every blasted last one of them is a nightmare with any update or minor change.
It's fixed now. Once I found what the real problem was as opposed to what the error messages were telling me. Took all of 5 seconds to solve.
Bah - I often hate computers but never more than when I'm trying to fix something and it's giving me all the wrong information.
Posted by: Teresa at March 15, 2011 01:15 PM (xE2iU)
3
I used to blame such difficulties on the perversity of inanimate objects. But once PCs hit the market, I realized that it's our own fault for teaching machines how to 'think'. And the more clever they become, the harder it is to detect/diagnose/fix them.
Posted by: Rev. Paul at March 15, 2011 02:20 PM (0DZhf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 12, 2011
My Spring is Sprung
/begin curmudgeonly rant
I’m so tired of all the “time hopping” can we just pick a time and stick with it? My preference would be for year round Daylight Savings Time, but at this point I’ll take Standard Time if we can just stop all this back and forth.
Yeah, yeah, yeah... I'll reset my clocks tonight. *sigh*
/curmudgeonly rant
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
05:08 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I loathe the time hopping. It's ridiculous.
Posted by: pam at March 13, 2011 08:46 AM (i3Kno)
2
So the question is, do you hate the time switch, or do you hate the resetting of the clocks?
Because I've noticed that more and more of the timekeepers in my life are becoming capable of auto-adjusting to the DST thing.
Posted by: Harvey at March 14, 2011 12:03 AM (pTueD)
3
Oh I hate the time switch! I have a hard enough time getting to sleep as it is.
I fit into the nightowl category they mention at the link and yeah - they are so right it really does mess up my body clock which is never in sync with the rest of the world in any case. LOL.
Posted by: Teresa at March 14, 2011 10:18 AM (xE2iU)
4
It's kicking my butt... I HATE it!
Posted by: Bou at March 14, 2011 08:49 PM (kun2B)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 13, 2011
Sunday... February Sunday... Ho-Hum
Yes we have arrived at the mid-February blahs. I dislike February. It’s the middle of winter. It’s cold. The prospects for warming up in the next 2 months are almost nil. It makes doing anything at all feel like a long slow slog up hill in cement boots.
Work. Exhausting unfulfilling work at that.
Valentine’s Day… meh. It does nothing for me.
One thing I saw yesterday did make me very happy. Kristine Rusch announced on twitter that her Retrieval Artist series of books is being reissued. She’s created The Retrieval Artist Website to keep track of the releases. Plus she has more stories coming soon! Excellent! I love this series of books and I guess I’m not the only one.
Like Orson Scott Card (read his review at the link. He has a terrific overview of the stories and it would be silly of me to try and rewrite it) I came across this series on Audible.com as my first free download. It’s read by Jay Snider who does an outstanding job on all the books. The man is a storytelling artist. The voices stay true to character through the entire series of 6 books which I find amazing.
Now they will be reissuing the books in paperback for those who prefer to read a “real” book. The Disappeared has already been issued. The series is out on Kindle (possibly Nook too although I haven’t checked). And new books are coming soon. That almost makes February okay. Yes, I’ve even gotten hold of the short stories on Kindle to read. Definitely worth it.
In his review Orson laments that the books aren’t numbered. I was able to figure out which order they were published without too much trouble, but Kris has the order listed on the new website to make it easy for people who don’t want to try and figure it out. I liked listening to them in order even if it isn’t strictly necessary. The back story does build through each book even if the books themselves are stand alone.
Orson mentions this, but I think I should too… If you are an aspiring writer/small business person - I highly recommend Kris’s Freelancer’s Survival Guide. I’m not a writer and I never will be, but her advice on the business side of writing is worth reading. It’s even worth a look if you are interested in starting some other type of small business. And she’s put it all out on her website for free. Pretty incredible.
So if you’re looking for some reading material to get you through the rest of this winter. Check it out.
Now I think I will listen to this series again. It’s that good.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
05:16 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 456 words, total size 3 kb.
February 09, 2011
Hand Cramps
That's what I have after scraping the driveway yet again yesterday. Didn't get the entire thing cleared before the subfreezing temps set in, but did get enough to get the steep parts dried out. OTOH it hurts to type.
Some winters you just can't win.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
10:56 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
1
We got a little less than an inch - to show what that can do to us here in the mountains, several major streets DownTown! are closed due to cars and trucks being slid and bumped every which direction.
Happy me gots no where to go, hopefully it will all be gone by the afternoon - as it should be.
Posted by: patti at February 10, 2011 08:58 AM (GSKiD)
2
Eight inches here in Arkansas. And I got to figure out how to get to work on time tomorrow, if I want a paycheck next week that'll do more than just fill my gas tank...
As far as the hand goes, sorry to hear it hurting. Sweet ibuprofen dreams.
Posted by: diamond dave at February 10, 2011 08:52 PM (9AqBo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
To Get The Right Answer...
Ask the right question.
Or
To get the right response when doing an internet search...
Search for the right thing.
Of course it helps if you have some idea of what that thing is.
I have spent a week searching for the solution to a problem we were having with some servers. I found the answer by accident yesterday when something I read finally got me asking the right question.
One problem down - on to the next. Yes, I'm now searching for the answer to yet another irritating problem on our work servers. I keep poking at these search engines hoping I will find something worthwhile.
What I find are a myriad of people with the same problem along with a whole bunch of "helper people" who have no clue, but are throwing out all kinds of weirdass suggestions to solve things.
Reading all this crap reminds me of a time years ago when I stumbled across a forum where someone was trying to get rid of a file left by a virus (back when viruses were more benign than they are now). The file attributes were set so it couldn't be deleted using windows explorer.
The helpful "tech" guy went through a long involved explanation to get rid of said file involving rebooting in to safe mode among other things. As I sat reading it, I was shaking my head wondering if the kid (had to be a kid) giving the tech advice even knew what a Command prompt was. And that all the person had to do was open such a prompt, change the attribute on the file to +w and they could then delete it - all within about 10 seconds. No booting into safe mode or any other time intensive idiocy.
It's a jungle full of muck out on the net. At technical meetings too... Many people full of self importance and "good advice" most of which is to spend money for some software we don't need. There is a very high testosterone level in this field. All these guys marking out their territory of "
this is the way to do things - this way and only this way will do!"
Everyone thinks they are 1000% right and everyone else is wrong. Not to mention the software they like is 1000% better than anything else out there and everything else is complete crap.
All this cruft takes up search engine result space and must be waded through to find the one answer I'm looking for.
That's what I've been doing and it makes me tired.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ho-Hum
at
12:36 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 435 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I have also experienced the wearying search for an answer which
should be simple ... if only you knew what it was called. And it's usually a link from a link from another link, before you stumble across the answer - by accident - in an article about something else.
I feel your pain, T. Hang in there!
Posted by: Rev. Paul at February 09, 2011 01:44 AM (9mybz)
2
I see that happening in my future soon...
Posted by: vwbug at February 09, 2011 05:35 AM (FPOeI)
3
Ditto what the Rev. Paul says. Where I really get irritated is when I find a forum where someone asks the same question, only to find out that nobody replied. Or even more irritating, when all the replies are from people looking for help with the same problem, but have no answer of their own. And the one that makes me want to reach through my monitor and strangle someone: the unhelpful reply from someone suggesting a totally impractical solution, like when you're having Windows XP problems decides to chime in: "dump it and install Linux/ get a Mac" or something else totally useless to the current situation. Okay, I'm looking for answers as to how to work with what I got, not with what I don't have, twit.
Posted by: diamond dave at February 10, 2011 09:07 PM (9AqBo)
4
Dave - LOL - yes I run across that all the time. It's soooo frustrating. I want a search engine that would let me drop all that crap. There should be some checkbox that says "solved" or "unsolved" so we don't have to waste our time reading the same questions over and over again.
Posted by: Teresa at February 13, 2011 05:29 PM (xE2iU)
5
New word: grustration
The frustration of being unable find what you're looking for with a Google search.
Posted by: Harvey at February 16, 2011 04:58 PM (pTueD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
107kb generated in 0.1798 seconds; 83 queries returned 324 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.