September 27, 2010
With all the online access that has lately popped up (things like Roku boxes) that allow instant online streaming of movies, I had once again started to think about it. After all, they are making it so easy, maybe it's worth it.
Then I read this
What Netflix CEO hopes U.S. won't notice
A misleading title for the article which annoys me greatly. Nowhere in the article does it say the Netflix CEO is hoping we won't notice the pricing difference. Nowhere. Go read it and see.
The gist of the article is that Netflix is going to charge Canadian users less for streaming video than American users. What is not said is that there is no "streaming only" option available in the US. So already we have a misleading article and a headline with a demonstrably false premise. The reporter is not grabbing me and gaining my sympathy or indignation here.
I don't give two hoots in hell what the company charges its customers. That is their call based on what they think the market will bear. In this case, the Canadians get a lower price because they are offered a little bit less than what an American subscription will give you. (as I noted above, this is not mentioned in the article)
For my part, I can look at a fee, the services received, and then decide whether or not I want the service. I can look at other similar services and see if they give me a better value for that same money. After gathering the information, I can make a decision on where to spend my money.
It's called "comparison shopping" - you may have heard of it.
The problem is, the CEO of Netflix, when questioned by the reporter about the price difference, opened his big mouth and had this to say:
THR: Are you concerned that American Netflix subscribers will look north and ask for the same discount Canadians get at $7.99?
Hastings: How much has it been your experience that Americans follow what happens in the world? It's something we'll monitor, but Americans are somewhat self-absorbed.
Why not just say - there's a sucker born every minute and we aim to make as much money from them as possible. It would be less of a slap in the face to those who do spend their money with this company.
To be fair Hastings has apologized. Of course he tries to pass it off as an "awkward joke". Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't. All we have is the end printed product. Since no one reading this was present at the interview, it's hard to say what was said and the tone of voice. Hastings is not claiming he was misquoted and that is something to keep in mind.
Go read the apology. I don't know whether to believe him or not. Astute business people do not deride their customers, even jokingly. To express such "joking" sentiments to a reporter, when you have no control over the end product, is astoundingly stupid on his part.
For now, I'll just sit here and gaze in my mirror. If I can manage to tear my gaze away from my awesome self, I'll have a look at my options and decide whether I need to spend any money on this new technology and where I should spend it. Right this minute, Mr. Hastings will have to excuse me, while I gaze.
Posted by: Teresa in
Idiocies
at
12:12 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 633 words, total size 4 kb.
We'll keep our subscription because it's a reasonable price for the service. We don't have cable, so rely on Netlix and Hulu... and yes, I love the Roku box. It has channels other than Netflix as well.
Posted by: pam at September 27, 2010 03:54 PM (i3Kno)
Posted by: Erica at September 27, 2010 07:20 PM (P3Z8e)
Posted by: Mitchell at September 27, 2010 10:22 PM (TWB//)
In the grand scheme Hastings wins anyway. Call it a lame joke. Everyone goes along with it because to do otherwise means... fewer movie options.
Everyone wants to watch movies and they will pay him to do so. He'll lose a bit of business, but people will be back. Next time the comments will be worse and people will say, well, it's not so bad... Then they'll wonder why the world is such an awful place.
Posted by: Teresa at September 27, 2010 10:55 PM (TeQXy)
Pam - not sure I would use it enough and I have other toys I would like to buy first.
Sheri - Yes! I love that you immediately were on the same wavelength!
E - LOL - thank you!
Posted by: Teresa at September 27, 2010 11:36 PM (TeQXy)
Posted by: Laura at September 28, 2010 10:48 AM (ua7hq)
Oh, and I think I should add- I wouldn't say most Amurricans are self-absorbed, just unaware of things outside their lil world. It's a fact most don't even watch or read the news.Surely ya'll work or interact with the general public. I know I usually feel like I'd rather take a beating then to deal with their dumbassery.
I just don't take what the man said personally. 'Cause I be watching da news and reading about da world events and all. That is all. : )
Posted by: Laura at September 28, 2010 11:32 AM (ua7hq)
As I recently saw in a story about a guy who traveled the world... he was in Germany and a man there was taking him to task for not knowing the German Prime Minister's name. So he asked the German guy... Okay who is the Prime Minister of Japan... the German didn't know. Of course that finally got the point across to him that maybe it's a little much to ask us to keep track of everything going on in the world all the time. heh.
Posted by: Teresa at September 28, 2010 11:49 AM (TeQXy)
Posted by: Laura at September 28, 2010 12:30 PM (ua7hq)
Posted by: Laura at September 28, 2010 12:37 PM (ua7hq)
I don't really have anything to lose by being snarky about his comment since I don't use his service anyway. I'm not even angry with him - I just think he's rude and stupid like most of the world today.
Posted by: Teresa at September 28, 2010 02:16 PM (TeQXy)
Posted by: sheri at September 30, 2010 02:47 PM (zRG4u)
Posted by: Harvey at October 02, 2010 03:34 PM (pTueD)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









