May 08, 2012
Shocking... Right
Saw this headline earlier on a local news feed
Shocking Find by TSA at RI Airport
TSA officials say the .40 caliber weapon, bullets and other gun parts were artfully packed inside three stuffed animals.
A man traveling with his 4-year-old son from T.F. Green Airport in Warwick, R.I. to Detroit on Monday was stopped at a security checkpoint.
Earlier today the story ended with this... Man and boy got on plane and left. Left? They go through security with a gun broken into bits in the luggage and TSA lets them just go on their merry way?
Now we find out why.
The man, who hasn't been identified, told law enforcement officials he was unaware the firearm was stuffed in his son's carry on. Sources tell NECN that the man told law enforcement officials he believes the boy's mother put it there.
Well, looks like they got off better than this poor girl.
Diabetic teen upset with TSA screeners at Salt Lake City Airport
Not only did they not know what to do about the insulin pump...
She says TSA agents then made the situation worse when they didn't know
what to do about her juice and insulin. "She said, because we don't have
the machines to scan the juice to make sure this is not an explosive we
do have to do a full body pat down and search your through your bags."
Of course, that's what she wanted in the first place, but it was too
late.
Ya gotta watch out for those 16 year old diabetics... you never know what she'll do. So break her $10K insulin pump BEFORE she does it!
The guy with the gun parts is no match for her.
In the meantime one has to wonder if they caught anyone really trying to do something bad. Well... other than the 16 year old girl...
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
11:02 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 314 words, total size 2 kb.
1
My husband wears an insulin pump and has a pacemaker. And he flies a lot. And yes, it's an understatement that he has a lot of fun going through security...not!
With diabetes being often called an "epidemic," I'm shocked at how little people in "authority" type positions know. Even in hospitals, Alan and I often have to teach the nurses about the pump, low/high blood sugar symptoms and proper foods. Seriously, it's crazy! Also, I just read a headline about some cops brutally beating a guy who was having low blood sugar symptoms. I couldn't bear to read past the headline because it hit too close to home.
Really, where is the training? Cops, nurses, anyone in public transportation or security should have some basic knowledge about this.
Argh! You can see that this post has struck a chord with me!!
Posted by: DogsDontPurr at May 09, 2012 06:10 PM (0JcSQ)
2
Oh yes I do understand exactly where you are coming from. I've worked with people who had Type 1 diabetes back in the day when insulin pumps were not even a flash on the horizon. It's pretty clear when you know the person is diabetic and they have a low blood sugar incident. Scary stuff.
Not sure how clear it would be to cops who expect bad behavior. *sigh* But you would at least expect nurses and doctors to be half way conversant. Geeze what do they learn in school anyway???
Posted by: Teresa at May 09, 2012 10:15 PM (qZOzE)
3
I wonder if they groped her too. Seriously. These TSA folks... I think some of them are pervs.
Posted by: Bou at May 12, 2012 10:29 PM (DkNsp)
4
Bou I begin to wonder too. That wasn't part of the story. Flying has become seriously annoying.
Posted by: Teresa at May 14, 2012 07:50 AM (qZOzE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 12, 2012
I Need a Spellchecker for my Spellchecker
I was writing something today and used the word "leapt". My spellchecker did not like it at all. Angry red dashes appeared under the offending word. Scary! I looked at it again and thought the spelling was correct.
Then I began to doubt myself. I could be wrong. It's been years since I've written the word (maybe dating back to my time in high school) Perhaps I'm not even using the right word. Horrors!!!!
Off I went to
dictionary.com which indeed confirmed not only did I spell it correctly, I used it correctly too. Well that's a relief. I guess I'm not totally drifting into senility yet.
I fixed the spellchecker by adding the word. It does worry me that a modern day spellchecker would not have a regular everyday type of word I learned back in grade school.
However, the burning question is... how many people are being misled on a daily basis by spellcheckers that don't know their words? Now that
is scary!
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
10:47 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 172 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And I'll tell you what else
is scary, Kids who can't solve a mathematical problem on paper.
Posted by: Yabu at April 13, 2012 05:43 AM (/u/1a)
2
Another peeve: remember when someone pled guilty? Now we hear that they "pleaded" guilty.
And for the record, "hugely" is not only NOT an adverb, it's not even a word!
{/rant}
Posted by: Rev. Paul at April 13, 2012 11:06 AM (upyv2)
3
Yabu - you are so right.
Paul - definitely I do remember. And I hope if I ever use hugely I do it correctly.
Posted by: Teresa at April 13, 2012 05:58 PM (qZOzE)
4
When I don't know how to spell a word, I just Google it. Works pretty well.
And when I'm torn between alternate spellings, I Google both and go with the most popular.
Posted by: Harvey at April 16, 2012 12:36 AM (Ha/T5)
5
Well at least I still get the red misspelling underline every time I type Obama. Even a machine knows he's a mistake!
Posted by: Peter at April 23, 2012 03:22 AM (0NB+H)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Weather News You Can Use
I have a Weatherbug widget on my home page. It gives me the cute little weather summary of an icon to show the type of weather then the high/low temps for 3 days. Underneath that is supposed to be weather headlines. Today there is only one and it reads:
Weather news:
California's weather has something for everyone.
So now a travel blog summary of the climate variety in California is "weather news" I need to know. Not sure why, but Weatherbug tells me so.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
12:20 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Well, I'll give you the *real* weather report for California: CRAZY!!!
I woke up this morning with severe thunderstorms, major lightning, torrential rain and flooding. (I live at the beach near LAX.) Then drove to work through various bursts of rain, sun, hail, mud, and rock slides. By the time I got to Malibu, it was sunny again. Then the return drive home was a similar mix to the drive up. Shampoo, rinse, repeat.
Now I'm home and it's beautifully clear and sunny! Crazy!
Posted by: DogsDontPurr at April 13, 2012 07:39 PM (0JcSQ)
2
Lol and we're in a drought. I guess the weather will continue to insist on being weird.
Posted by: Teresa at April 13, 2012 09:41 PM (qZOzE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 25, 2012
When To End An Interview
I spotted this headline today.
Lawmakers Call for Investigation of Facebook Password Requests
Employers are asking for username/passwords for facebook? I assume it must be happening somewhere although I am not interviewing for jobs, so I have no person experience of this phenom. Still, I find this a stunning invasion of privacy!
My immediate reaction:
The interview ends the minute someone asks for any username/password for any personal account.
Yes, I will stand up, thank them nicely, and say "It's been interesting talking with you. Thank you for your time. Good bye." This would hold true whether or not I had an account on the social media site.
You may think it's a bit extreme. You may, if you've been looking for a job for a long time and are desperate, think it's cavalier of me to say this. You may think... "but you're leaving them with the impression you have something to hide!"
That is exactly the reaction they are counting on. You need to turn your thinking around! If you give them the passwords, you have put someone else in control of your online data. We will return to this in a moment.
First I need to state this: an employer is perfectly within their rights to dig around on the internet and find any information that has been made
public about you. They can find public facebook postings (which is why you should be very careful what your friends post about you or what pictures your friends tag you with on facebook), twitter feeds, blog posts, linkedin posts, and any other publicly available internet information. I have no problem with a company researching an employee before hiring them. Just as an employee should check out a company prior to the interview. Therefore, public data gathering is not the problem.
There are several problems with employers asking for your login credentials to any of the social media sites.
First and foremost, it violates laws already in place regarding what an employer can ask you about your personal life. With access to a social media site they know about your marital status (okay so they might know if you are married but they aren't supposed to ask about your life with your spouse), your parental status, possibly your sexual orientation, even your political ideology. All of which are not part of the job interview last time I heard.
Then there is the problem of someone else having control of your account. This is the one that is most disturbing. Here are just a few of the questions to ponder.
Who gets the login info? who does the looking? how do you know they won't change anything while logged in? how do you know they aren't using your account to find information about someone else? what information might they copy that you consider "private"? what will they do with any info they find on your site? what do they do with the login info once they have looked at your site?
The last question is the least important since giving away your login info is like giving away the keys to your house, now the only thing to do is change the lock (in this case, the password).
They've been on your account and gotten whatever information they wanted, what's to stop them from logging in again? what's to stop them from using information they gathered while on your site in a detrimental way?
The list could go on for pages, but if none of the above bother you... then maybe you are a good fit for the company.
Something else that bothers me is knowing that one set of login credentials is often used over and over by unsophisticated computer users. Therefore, facebook login credentials could give the company access to things like credit card accounts, bank accounts, health accounts... and this is just for an interview‽ (I was listening to
Grammar Girl and just had to use the Interobang here)
While the request and its ramifications are mind boggling, I don't believe new laws are needed. The current laws covering what employers can do during interviews should be sufficient. However, it may need to be emphasized that these laws cover social media as well as other aspects of personal life. So, it's a good thing to bring this to the attention of the public. People need to know why they shouldn't say yes to this request. But, I see no reason to pass any specific law for "social media".
So keep your passwords to yourself. If you have ever given out a password even if it's for purposes of getting tech assistance. It's time to change it and change any other site that uses the same password.
This has been a public service post. We now return you to our regularly scheduled navel gazing.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
10:47 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 811 words, total size 5 kb.
1
As a former HR/hiring manager, I was wondering when someone would bother to mention that it's illegal for an employer to ask for that.
Posted by: Rev. Paul at March 26, 2012 11:19 AM (upyv2)
2
People get intimidated too, during interviews, I guess. I'm with you, I'd be outta there, quick, and thinking thuss-pith-yuss thoughts about such obnoxious people.
Posted by: sheri at March 26, 2012 03:13 PM (7FREh)
3
Paul - no one wants to mention we already have laws. If they do, then the DC power hungry sharks won't have a reason to pass even more laws.
Sheri - I figure this is something people need to think about before they go into an interview so they aren't blindsided by it. If I hadn't read this, I'm not sure how fast I would be able to think, but I wouldn't give out my password so instead of ending things nicely on my terms things might not go quite so well. LOL.
Posted by: Teresa at March 26, 2012 09:46 PM (qZOzE)
Posted by: joated at March 27, 2012 03:38 PM (nvFg0)
5
Is it ok to give them your login, then excuse yourself to go to the bathroom and use your phone to change your password?
Posted by: Harvey at April 01, 2012 12:48 AM (Ha/T5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 15, 2012
New Tech Should Spring Forth Fully Formed and Functional!
I came across this article today.
Researchers send 'wireless' message using neutrinos
Of course I read it because it's one of those articles that makes me believe Star Trek was really a show from the future and we might just get there someday...
Then, because I am an idiot, I read the comments. OMG the comments!!! A few were funny, some were impressed or at least interested that some sort of research was going on.
But others... there are always the others. The whiners. They want to complain about price. They want to moan about the equipment not being able to do the job. They want to mutter about idiots doing stupid experiments.
Apparently all the tech we have today sprang up fully formed and ready to sit on our desktops. All cell phones have always been like the iphones or Androids you see now - never were they the size and weight of a good sized brick. All computers were always sitting on the desktop with nice thin screens. There was never a computer the size of a small house that wheezed along by reading punch cards and trying to calculate a few equations so we could send men to the moon.
It's disturbing to see people so hell bent on telling us not only that it won't work, but that the scientists were stupid to even try it. The saddest part is, these morons have built their case on a blurby little blog post that dumbs everything down so the semi-literate layman can claim to understand some of what is going on. From there the critics feel free to tell us why it will never work.
I shall never have my Star Trek future because these idiots have no dreams and therefore want to make sure no one else has them either. Because... dreams are stupid and they'll never work.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
09:25 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 321 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I never ever comment on something like that simply because I don't know what I'm talking about. Even I know my limits. lol
But that whole last sentence of yours.....wow. That's a very sad, but accurate, recap of our time......
Posted by: Tammi at March 16, 2012 11:28 AM (8K1lx)
2
Sad, isn't it? At least there are still educated people who are willing to take a chance & try new things.
We need the Enterprise to take us all to
that planet. I think.
Posted by: Rev. Paul at March 16, 2012 01:07 PM (upyv2)
3
Sort of related to what I think you're saying, I read something not long ago in which the guy was arguing that all the great innovation is pretty much over, that we created more back when and don't anymore largely because of stifling regulation. Not sure who's right there, but it was interesting to think about.
Posted by: Sheri at March 17, 2012 10:40 PM (7FREh)
4
This isn't surprisingly. Supposedly, the head of the US Patent Office once said that everything that could be invented, already had been.
In
1899.
I suspect we'll hear something like that yet again before too awfully long.
Posted by: CGHill at March 18, 2012 08:59 PM (OUKg3)
5
One of these days I'll figure out this Preview thing, I promise.
Posted by: CGHill at March 18, 2012 09:00 PM (OUKg3)
6
Charles I often tell myself I'll figure out preview and I never do...
Yes, every once in a while people talk about everything that can be invented has been invented. Or that because of "X" nothing more like "X" will ever be invented again.
The surprising thing to me is after everyone's experience of innovation that anyone has the idiocy to even say these things. LOL.
I can see many great things being stalled indefinitely until some smart person finds a way around the road blocks to get to new innovation. I just hope that too many aren't too stymied in my lifetime. I love new toys too much to be happy with things staying just as they are.
Oh yeah... not going to preview because I'm tired and if I got something wrong I figure everyone but me will catch it. Ha.
Posted by: Teresa at March 18, 2012 09:31 PM (qZOzE)
7
Worst of all some a-hole 5 or 6 levels up from you will think the concept is really cool, and demand that you create a production ready model by the end of week.
Posted by: Cappy at March 19, 2012 06:25 PM (KqcM+)
8
Don't worry, people who create useful things learned to tune out naysayers a LONG time ago.
Let 'em squawk. It's all they're good at.
Posted by: Harvey at March 24, 2012 02:01 PM (Ha/T5)
9
Harvey, I hope you're right. LOL.
Posted by: Teresa at March 27, 2012 09:27 AM (qZOzE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 29, 2012
Trackery
In the comments to
the previous post there is some discussion of tracking by google. Thoughts of which tend to make me feel extremely paranoid.
Then I remembered this post from Ars Technica the other day.
Google already knows you're a 24-year old woman who loves wombats
And I checked to see what google thinks of me...
Your categories and demographics
No interest or demographic categories are associated with your ads preferences so far. You can add or edit interests and demographics at any time.
Yes, I must have opted out of ad tracking a while back and forgotten. I don't think it's the "ad block plus" I use on my browser... but maybe it is.
Right now google is not owning up to tracking me around the web. Not sure if that makes me feel better or not. Hmmm...
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
12:51 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 141 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Are you sure you secretly don't covet wombats?
Posted by: Kim at January 29, 2012 07:16 PM (Un17U)
2
Kim I think I do, but google is trying to let me fool myself...
Posted by: Teresa at January 29, 2012 11:23 PM (jxg4K)
3
As of March 1st, you cannot opt out. Which is moot, because you know they do it anyway. Track you. Maybe they don't keep records of your wombat views for their research, but they know.
[shudder]
Posted by: pam at January 30, 2012 06:35 AM (VZULe)
4
Pam - I'm hoping they are entertained. I could become the next google star... Just sayin'...
Posted by: Teresa at January 30, 2012 08:10 PM (jxg4K)
5
I'm a 65+ year old male...
Posted by: Bou at February 05, 2012 09:50 PM (DkNsp)
6
LOL - yeah Bou I can see you now...
Posted by: Teresa at February 05, 2012 11:11 PM (qZOzE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 16, 2012
Upgrade
Over the weekend I upgraded my Mac from the Snow Leopard OS to Lion. Then upgraded Mobile Me to iCloud.
The only reason I did this is because Mobile Me is going away in June. I didn't want to make the move until the initial uproar had died down, but didn't want to wait until the stragglers were doing a last minute switch. I figured the middle of January would be a good time.
Luckily Don McAllister of
Screencasts Online made a couple of tutorials to make things smoother for the rest of us. I made 3 backups of my system, downloaded the Lion app from the App store. Made a copy of that and saved it to a separate drive, then installed.
It all went so well I've been rather dazed. Not only that, but my machine is behaving much better under Lion. I think all the applications, with the "Lion ready" updates, didn't work so well in Snow Leopard anymore.
Of course the downside was the upgrade to iCloud. It sucked. Apple tells you to sign in with your Appleid. This is okay if you are new to Apple and have no Mobile Me stuff.
If you have Mobile Me already DO NOT DO IT! DO NOT!!! Sign in using your Mobile Me account - trust me you will be very glad you did!
That was my big mistake. My appleid and my mobile-meid were two different things. I had to sit through about 3 hours of chat with an Apple Mobile-Me person to get it straight. They knew what they were doing, but OMG it all takes forever on chat! I got the 2 id's combined and it's all working finally!
I have yet to see if Lion will continue to play nice... iCloud too for that matter. I had no documents on Mobile Me so I think that works greatly in my favor. Many people had issues with disappearing documents.
So I've now gone through the painful process. It's nearly as bad as when a computer dies and you have to get a new one. It's why I wait as long as I think I can before doing anything.
Let's hope that's it for a while. Whew!
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
03:26 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 372 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I only use apple's email to access my .mac mail from work on a winders machine. The .mac/.me is really the poopiest system ever for web access but it's one of my main email addys so i'm too lazy to change it...in spite of paying for it.
Anyhow, I've been rather loathe to do this iCloud bit. I don't want my stuff online at all.
Posted by: Mr. Bingley at January 19, 2012 07:37 AM (OXWdU)
2
ah, and looking at it my winders machine is xp so that aint gonna work.
Posted by: Mr. Bingley at January 19, 2012 08:04 AM (OXWdU)
3
Mr. Bingley I have no idea what they are going to do for people who haven't got a Lion machine but have an email addy. It's weird. If I were you, I'd start looking around to find out before June. You may even want to make an appointment at the genius bar at the apple store to see what they say... in person being MUCH better than online!
Posted by: Teresa at January 19, 2012 09:10 AM (jxg4K)
4
Well I would imagine for my home system, which is running 10.6.8 or so, there will be no problem getting stuff using the standard 'mail' application; I assume I just won't have access to my .mac stuff whilst on the road. Not the end of the world, really.
Posted by: Mr. Bingley at January 19, 2012 09:42 AM (OXWdU)
5
I would talk to people about it. I think you should be able to update to icloud and you would be able to access from the net just like you do now. I know when I was having issues logging in from the internet to icloud (it wasn't showing my mail on icloud) I was still getting it via my mail.app.
You will have to move it to icloud somehow or it will cease to work in June. That I do know. It's such a PITA.
Posted by: Teresa at January 19, 2012 11:07 PM (jxg4K)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 16, 2011
Winding Down the Week
Okay so it's been about a week since I posted something. And then I realized I don't have anything much to say even after a week.
I totally missed some sort of debate last night because really... who wants to voluntarily watch a bunch of idiots blowing hot air?
I haven't had time to take any pictures lately or even look at those I took a while back. Then again I have such a low attention threshold I almost never feel like going back and working on photos I took longer ago than last week.
I picked up
flipboard for my iphone. I can't decide if I like it or not. I haven't created an account because they won't let me do it on my big computer and I'm too lazy to try doing it on my iphone with the tiny keyboard. So I open it and flip through the stories hoping something really interesting will be included. So far nothing has really grabbed me. I've seen other people tweeting how much they love it so I must be doing something wrong. heh.
After a conversation I had earlier today I keep thinking I really really need to write a book titled:
A Geek's Guide Do-it-yourself computer security for people who think nothing will ever happen to them. The prospect is daunting though and I don't know where to start. Oh my.
Okay I need to get back to writing some code. I think I've procrastinated long enough. Have a nice weekend.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
05:09 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 256 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Yeah I have Flipboard for my iPhone and it's "ok." I guess it depends on what you choose for your content. The best for me so far was one day when it posted as the "cover story" a pic of "Zilla" that PMC had tweeted. I did LOL at that.
I like your book idea. I've been halfway looking at self-publishing via Kindle. Apparently that's a kinda big thing right now. Or maybe it isn't but they're trying to make it seem that way. Heh.
Posted by: sheri at December 17, 2011 11:31 AM (7FREh)
2
Okay if they're gonna post pics of 'Zilla I'll give 'em a shot. LOL.
As for the book thing, from what I hear the biggest thing to do is make sure one finds a really good independent editor. But then again one has to write the damned thing first. Oh my...
Posted by: Teresa at December 17, 2011 11:42 AM (jxg4K)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 05, 2011
Stuck in a rut is far less work
Saw this tweet go out today via Twitter Support:
Some users are unable to upload a new . We're aware of the issue & working to fix it.
And it occurred to me to wonder... how many people try to change their avatars and how often? I know I see avatars that seem to be changed on a weekly and even daily basis on twitter and facebook.
My thought? There's at least 15 minutes of my life I won't get back just to change a teensy picture... not to mention the abusive tweets one decides must be written once one does waste the time to change the avatar only to find that twitter is (surprise!) FUBAR. And then the anxious waiting until twitter says "it's fixed". Followed by more abusive tweeting to the twitter help after one finally gets the beloved avatar changed.
Yeah, it makes me tired just thinking about all that work for a teensy picture. I think I'll go take a nap.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
01:43 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 173 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Also, you get so used to seeing one pic, the change is just too much all at once. Too weird. So you're like, "
OMG why did they change?! I don't like change! Why have they done this to me? How am I supposed to
deal with this? This is awfully unfair and abrupt! I must go lie down now."
Posted by: sheri at December 05, 2011 03:08 PM (7FREh)
2
Exactly. Too mentally stressing for words. Ennui then sets in...
Posted by: Teresa at December 05, 2011 06:35 PM (jxg4K)
3
I figured I'd generated enough ennui with my
first picture.
Posted by: CGHill at December 06, 2011 08:25 PM (p37iV)
4
LOL - I did change my picture once... don't plan on doing that again for a while.
Posted by: Teresa at December 07, 2011 03:36 PM (jxg4K)
5
I don't even know if I know how to change mine. Nor do I care. I set it like seven years ago when I started to blog. I don't even remember... doing it. But I did, because I recognize the fake picture of me as something I created...
Posted by: Bou at December 14, 2011 10:49 PM (DkNsp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 02, 2011
Geekery
Tonight I am tired of computers.
After setting up a server today and trying to set up access controls (the user can only do certain things and nothing else) I was wishing I could just tell the friggin' computer "this is what I want to let them do - nothing else - got it?" At which point it would do all the nitpicky work and I'd be finished.
But then I realized as soon as we can tell computers this stuff, someone will figure out a way to tell the computer a long story, instead of giving it a command... something like Little Red Riding Hood... then they'd say "command shell". Then they would own your computer. I call it Future Buffer Overflow.
I know this little post will lose me the last 3 readers who persist in reading... heh.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
06:16 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 141 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Still here. Grin.
Posted by: cin at December 02, 2011 10:09 PM (DBAeF)
Posted by: Mary at December 03, 2011 12:49 AM (/5Cnu)
3
I came here because I bought Trey Ratcliff's HDR course. Poking around in the forums, I found some of your posts, followed your links and liked what I saw.
I don't plan on going anywhere.
In the meantime, however, I like the concept of trying to give the computer more information than it can handle vis-à-vis voice to voice recognition software to create a buffer overrun. It's the makings of a great short story or maybe even a
Leverage plot.
Posted by: ProfessorTom at December 03, 2011 09:28 AM (soZ5a)
4
Hi Ladies... can't believe you persist in reading when I've been so neglectful lately. LOL.
Welcome Professor Tom. I used to post quite a few photos but then I got busy working and all that has been kicked to the curb for a bit. Not sure exactly where my time is going but it does seem to be gone for the most part and I haven't had much time to do anything with pictures - which is rather sad. I hope I can get going again soon.
Posted by: Teresa at December 03, 2011 11:43 AM (jxg4K)
5
I like your nerd-posts. Also, I come here for the waters.
[Renault: "The waters
? What waters? We're in the desert."
Rick: "I was misinformed."
]
Snort.
Posted by: sheri at December 04, 2011 06:29 AM (7FREh)
6
I hope the waters are very um... watery. LOL.
Posted by: Teresa at December 05, 2011 01:20 PM (jxg4K)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 18, 2011
Headline...
Saw this headline today:
Mass. Gov. Patrick aims to lower unemployment
And my first thought was... so he's going to shoot the unemployed because that would certainly lower the unemployment rate.
I blame The Bloggess. I
read this and laughed so I am certainly going to hell. Then I read a bunch of the comments which made me laugh even more (especially #25 about Pittsburgh). So what do you expect when I then see the headline above... it's all in how you look at things.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
02:23 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 86 words, total size 1 kb.
November 02, 2011
So Are They Saying Women Shouldn't Drive?
I follow
Car Talk on facebook. They posted a link to this article from Cars.com
Study: Women More Likely to be Injured in Car Accidents
Here's the bit at the end that I found baffling...
Still, if you’re operating vehicle without advanced airbags, it’s
important to take into account the heightened risk of injury if you are a
female driver.
Take into account... What in the world does that mean?
Are we supposed to creep along at 20mph just in case? Wear armor? Send up a flag so everyone knows there's an old airbag in the car? Buy better life insurance? Get better crash insurance? Sheesh.
While it's interesting to know that newer cars have better airbags in them, the conclusion is silly.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
12:43 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 130 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Isn't this true even if the woman isn't driving but instead is a passenger in the front seat? So aren't they really saying that if women
must travel by car, they had better sit in the back?
Come to think of it, I had heard that with airbags, anyone smaller than the size of the average twelve-year-old is advised to ride in the back, as airbag deployment could be fatal if you're too small. I'm not sure what use that advice is for petite women who need to go places, though.
Posted by: Julie at November 02, 2011 02:05 PM (/g8s/)
2
Julie - the funny thing is I'm about the size of the "average man" they use as a template for car building. I'm 5'9" so the "small woman" issue doesn't apply to me. But I read this crap being spewed about and it makes no sense.... "take into account"... I shake my head.
Does that mean smaller women need to rethink ever driving at all? As you say, do they now sit in the back seat? It's weird and certainly unacceptable. Not to mention the absolute absurdity of the statement makes me laugh.
The good thing to know is that cars built after 2007 have better airbag systems in them that perform better in an accident.
An even more interesting item that is never ever mentioned... what about men who are TALLER than the norm. There is never any data on their chance of injury or fatality when driving cars built for guys about 4-8 inches (on average) shorter than they are.
Posted by: Teresa at November 02, 2011 03:16 PM (jxg4K)
3
That was poor writing. They should have phrased it differently. The injury rate is higher because of the safety systems, to us small women. I interpreted it to say, if you are a small woman you need to have a car with advanced airbags.
There are two kinds of airbags. The old ones, in the car years they were talking about, are dangerous for us 12 year old sized women. We can be decapitated. I've heard some real horror stories. For years, I refused to buy a car with airbags, but then I got into a jam that all of them had them, so I was going to get pedal extenders to push me away from the steering wheel.
The new airbags take into account weight and other factors when you are up front. The probability of injury is much lower for us of substandard stature.
"Still, if you’re operating vehicle
;">without advanced airbags, it’s important to take into account the heightened risk of injury if you are a female driver."
That highlighted part is the part that scares small people like me.
Posted by: Bou at November 02, 2011 09:33 PM (NZHwq)
4
Oh yes, I know about the real issue with airbags and small women and younger children. I just thought the end of the article was very badly written.
Not everyone is in a position to do something about the vehicle they drive. So if one is stuck with an older vehicle with old airbags, I have to wonder what they expect these people to do?
Posted by: Teresa at November 02, 2011 10:06 PM (jxg4K)
5
And I need to check to see if I'm in that situation. I thought that when I bought my Sienna in 04 that it had an advanced version of airbags, but now I'm not so sure. I know my husband's car does. If I put something heavy in the passenger seat of his Audi, it rings a bell for a seatbelt.
I have 190K on my car and REALLY REALLY want to take it to 250K. REALLY want to take it that far. As I said to my eldest, "It's... FREEEE!"
I'm not sure what I'm going to do when I get a new car in 2014ish and it's all advanced with iPod plug ins etc. I know my current car has a cassette player. I brought my iPod cassette to Tennessee so I could listen to my iPod on my drive for ATL to TN. I just sat there in the driver's seat as I realized... new cars don't come with cassette players...
Posted by: Bou at November 03, 2011 02:16 PM (NZHwq)
6
Take it into account means wear body armor
Just not female body armor:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTGh0EMmMC8
Posted by: Harvey at November 05, 2011 04:03 PM (pTueD)
Posted by: Teresa at November 05, 2011 04:20 PM (jxg4K)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 21, 2011
When I Said I Was Worried About the Camera...
Y'all thought I was kidding...
Check it out.
Doesn't look ready for prime time, but that never stopped anyone. heh.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
09:41 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I didn't think you were kidding. I'm still trying to figure out if the iCloud is secure or if I should continue backing up to my computer... LOL!
Posted by: pam at October 23, 2011 07:57 AM (VZULe)
2
My advice - if you have a computer backup for your system that is working... keep backing up your i-device to your computer. At the moment iCloud does not offer a way to back up to both your desktop and iCloud at the same time. At this point it's not the security that is at issue, it's the reliability of iCloud that has not been proven over time.
If you think you can remember to do it (aka give yourself periodic reminders) you can backup to iCloud and periodically plug in and do a manual backup to your own computer... but how many people remember to do that?
Add to this you only get 5GB free storage and that may be the deal breaker for many right now. I'm in wait and see mode for much of these changes.
Posted by: Teresa at October 23, 2011 11:18 AM (jxg4K)
3
Seriously...the only way to save your stuff is to back it up to a device that you can unplug or unload, and put in your pocket, and walk away with it. Might have to put it in your "pack", but at least you've got it. I would never depend on the "Cloud", whatever the flavor...also, 5 GB is nothing. You put your stuff out there, and someone / sometime will read it.
The only people who remember to do backups, are the ones that have lost everything before. Kinda like experiencing a house fire.
If people believe their data is "secure" in the "Cloud", they're crazy. Once you put it out there, it's there forever.
If people can't remember to do local backups, they shouldn't have a computer. Just schedule 'em for the middle of the night might work, ya think?
Just sayin'.
Posted by: Yabu at October 23, 2011 03:40 PM (k2zTG)
4
Well, the way to really backup well is the 3-2-1 rule. The data must live in 3 places. Two of those places must be off the main computer and one of those places must be offsite. So, you would have
-- your original data on your computer.
-- a backup hard drive that lives on your desktop or closet
-- an offsite backup either to an encrypted cloud storage or a hard drive you have moved to someplace like a bank, or your office or a friend's place.
One copy is not a backup - hard drives fail far too easily and so do CD burns and that kind of thing. The local backup copy is there for ease of use - it's right there... but if your house burns down or someone breaks in and steals your stuff or if there's a tornado, flood, what have you... that last backup offsite is your insurance that you can get your data back.
Most good backup services offer you the ability to encrypt your data before it's ever uploaded. They also tell you if you lose your password, you won't be getting your data back because they can not decrypt it for you. I use
Crash Plan - I like them.
Posted by: Teresa at October 23, 2011 07:48 PM (jxg4K)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 11, 2011
This and That
We were down in Boston over the weekend. Got 2 days of sailing in and stayed in the city on Saturday. Might be the last 2 days of sailing this season, so we didn't want to miss the great weather.
We knew about the protestors, we even saw one of them walking along with his sign (although not holding it up since he wasn't with a group). Little did we know there was also a movie being filmed (
RIPD). And since it was a holiday weekend there was also a parade. Whew! Add the warm weather and you can see why we were happy to get out on the water and away from the crazy.
I have pics that I haven't uploaded yet. They aren't very good since they're iphone. Some might be interesting.
The movie seemed to have taken over everything in our part of the city. I didn't see any of the "stars". This was a good thing as far as I was concerned because there were too many fans hanging around waiting to see their idols. All we wanted was to find a way around the closed streets... get to the hotel, get to Starbucks. It was annoying mostly.
I have never seen so much large equipment all in one place when they aren't trying to fix a road or build something. Blocks and blocks of semis with equipment, all kinds of cranes, lights, fans... they trucked in everything. There were security guards all over, every corner you'd be able to trip over at least one usually more. I was wondering why they were around since they appeared to be more concerned with chatting on phones or talking with friends who stopped by than actually watching anything. I should look into a gig like that.
There are many many many many extra people milling about a movie set. The primary activity appeared to be (once again) standing around and talking. If they all get credited at the end, no wonder it takes 15 minutes just to show all the names. There should be a category called "Best Conversationalist".
Luckily sailing was great. The restaurants and most of the bars were great. The exception was the hotel bar. It had reserved tables... spend level was minimum $60... Okayfine. We left and went down the street to another bar for a last drink. Maybe they made some money on the reserves... maybe the big stars came in later. All we wanted was a last drink and a place to sit. We found it. I mentioned this since the hotel insisted on sending me one of those surveys (how tiresome those are)... I told them it would have been nice if the table charge had been mentioned when the bar was being presented as a place to go at the hotel... I'm guessing nothing will come of that.
In the meantime... speaking of movies. It seems the Zombies are trying to make sure Brad Pitt's new movie does not get filmed.
Police seize weapons from Brad Pitt film
Personally I figured the police were annoyed because the film crew wouldn't let them talk too...
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
09:41 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 527 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I like the way you put "stars" in quotation marks. Heh. I followed the link and my attention was riveted to Brad Pitt's GREY beard. I think this means I'm "getting" "old."
Posted by: sheri at October 12, 2011 06:03 AM (7FREh)
2
When it comes to actors and being a movie star and all that, I guess it all depends on who knows you. After all, I had no idea who Ryan Reynolds was until I was confronted with this movie being made. Of course many young girls were there ready to scream if they caught a glimpse (thank heaven I was blocks away when there was one apparent sighting...) So I'm not sure what makes someone a "star" LOL.
Posted by: Teresa at October 12, 2011 12:13 PM (jxg4K)
3
First time I saw Ryan Reynolds was in a sleeper-stupid-but-funny movie called "Waiting." It's stupid as hell, but Hub and I still quote lines from it and everyone I've pointed to it "get" it even though it is
AWESOMELY stupid. You were warned. It helps, I think, if you've ever worked in a restaurant.
Posted by: sheri at October 14, 2011 08:16 AM (7FREh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 27, 2011
Notes Jotted At the Airport
Here were a few things I was noticing while waiting for our flights. I can't help but write them down because it's fun.
-- OMG geeky guy next to me in geeky deep philosophical coding conversation on phone. Let me gag him!
-- If I ever wear big white tennies to travel my husband has instructions to shoot me.
-- Geeky guy just exclaimed "Gate 19!" hung up on his friend, jumped out of his seat, walked off leaving his computer, half eaten sandwich, and bags to check gate change. Wow.
-- Why is there always one person who won't sit down when we're trying to get going? Why?
-- No kids on this flight. I'm sure that's a first ever!
-- Southwest has much nicer terminal areas than United. Much.
-- What is with people just stopping either directly after walking off the jetway or in the middle of the main walking corridor blocking traffic when they exit the plane? Idiots.
-- Pilot talking on intercom. Sound is so bad we can't begin to hear him. So what's the point? I guess this means we'll be landing soon. Excellent.
-- Woman in front of me has fully reclined her seat but keeps tossing about on it like she can't find a comfortable position. Waiting for the seat back to collapse onto my lap. It's only a 2 hour flight - not an all-nighter!
And thus some of the thoughts that flitter through my head become an eventual blog post.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
09:28 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 255 words, total size 2 kb.
1
That one person who won't sit down? Oh yeah, I know who you mean. What gets me is they STILL don't sit the hell down even when the flight attendant comes on the PA 2-3 times, "Please be seated so we can leave on time." Hint? Ya think? GAH. Those people infuriate me. They need clues, and badly.
Same with the people who stop and block traffic in the jetway, or decide to have a big ole pow-wow with family members at the bottom of the escalator. Grrrr.
Seat reclining idiots. Like it's SO much more comfy to recline that extra 2 degrees? I keep thinking the seat-reclining idiots will realize that no one else is reclining and feel guilty about doing it. But there's always that ONE seat-reclining idiot, and yes, he/she is always right in front of me. I usually scream loudly when they first recline, hoping they'll realize they just clocked my kneecaps. "AAHHHHHHGGGGH!" I go. All dramatic-like. Sometimes it gets their attention, but they don't "care." Because they are "selfish" idiots. I just hope karma gets 'em.
Well, thanks T, for getting my BP up with this post. Heh.
Posted by: sheri at September 28, 2011 06:12 AM (7FREh)
2
LOL - well, didn't really mean to get the BP into the stratosphere. I do like blogging the oddities of travel though. Irritating but fun stuff.
Posted by: Teresa at September 28, 2011 08:59 PM (jxg4K)
3
Two things:
1- United, in addition to not having awesomer terminals than Southwest, also breaks guitars. I've always had crappy luck with air travel. Either the luggage is lost, or the flight's delayed. It's always something. United and El Al (natch) are the only two airlines that have not screwed me up, down and every which way.
2- A dooshbag seat reclining / Hairboy story: We flew together once, from EWR to SAT, for a blogmeet and, while we were sitting in the Continental terminal making small talk, it came up in conversation that whenever he flies, without fail, the plane's one seat reclining dooshbag always manages to sit in front of him. Whatever. I didn't think anything of it. So there we are, on the plane, and within 30 seconds after takeoff -- bam! -- the seat in front of him goes down, right up against his knees, and the face he made: priceless.
Personally, I prefer sitting upright. Then again, I prefer not flying at all, but one does what they have to do.
Posted by: Erica at September 28, 2011 11:31 PM (PY2l4)
4
Waaaah...I don't know how to make HTML hard returns.
Posted by: Erica at September 28, 2011 11:32 PM (PY2l4)
5
Southwest Flight Attendant:
"Eeny, meeny, miny, moe, take a seat we gotta go". They (SW) got sued over that one. Unbelievable.
Posted by: Yabu at September 29, 2011 08:18 AM (qX1hg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 27, 2011
It's Obligatory
About once a year or so reporters feel obligated to tell us how technology will ruin our lives. This time, it's the "smartphone".
Sleep with your iPhone? You're not alone
While smartphone users worry about mobile hacking and other security
threats that are making news these days, psychologists and others are
concerned about another equally troubling issue: the growing obsession
among people who would much rather interact with their smartphones than
with other human beings.
Didn't I hear this about, let's see... radio, television, Walkmans, ipods, computers, computer games, texting phones, etc, etc, etc.
I swear there has been at least one story like this every year since I can remember. When I was a kid (and we had 3 whole tv channels) the story was
"Kids aren't going outside to play! They sit in front of the tv mesmerized! What will become of us!!!"
The funniest part of the story which is reflected in the title of the piece...
For some, the anxious feeling that they might miss something has caused
them to slumber next to their smartphones. More than a third of U.S.
adults -- 35 percent -- now own a smartphone, according to the Pew
Research Center, and two-thirds of them sleep with their phones right
next to their beds.
For the two-thirds mentioned here, they don't mention whether or not this is the only phone in the house.
And
No word on whether those in technology meltdown have a landline phone next to their beds...
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
12:46 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 251 words, total size 2 kb.
1
We finally lost the landline tech altogether, and have only a cell phone for the "home" phone. I mounted a little pocket on the kitchen wall over the attachment plate for the old phone, and hung the cell there. I still don't want it in my bedroom.
Posted by: Rev. Paul at July 27, 2011 02:27 PM (0DZhf)
2
We have always had a landline in our bedroom. In the middle of the night it's better than stumbling around the house trying to get to the phone. Because you KNOW if it rings then, it's an emergency. Like when my dad was taken to the hospital and they couldn't get hold of my sister.
Now, I bring my cell up there, turn off the sound, and lay it face down for the night. It's a secondary emergency device if the landline is down or out, I can always text or call if I need to.
I don't ever look at anything on the phone when I'm in my bedroom, just have it handy for if it's needed. If it was my only line, I'd leave the sound on for phone, but turn off all other sounds. But that's just me. heh.
Posted by: Teresa at July 27, 2011 02:49 PM (xE2iU)
3
I sleep with my iPhone, of course. It's my alarm, music to fall asleep to, Netflix if I want to take in a show while getting ready for bed... but I rarely check my email for Facebook. Okay... rarely means sometimes, but there's no related anxiety.
Dadgum researchers.
Posted by: pam at July 27, 2011 04:52 PM (i3Kno)
4
iPhone next to the bed, sound off, face down. Yep. Landline is still there but the only time it "rings" it's telemarketers and other "loosers." And the "ring" is "silent." I'm running out of "sneer" quotes so I'm leaving "now."
Posted by: sheri at July 27, 2011 05:21 PM (Dlmrk)
5
I dropped my land line about five years ago...didn't need it anymore. I put my iPhone in my bedroom at night, sometimes, turned way down, just in case I need to call 911 to report I've just killed an intruder. Stretch is the ultimate alarm. Nothing gets past him, and I mean nothing. Heck, he hears the mailman four blocks away. Also, no way you can oversleep when you're sleeping with a dog.
It is turned way down because, generally, the only calls I receive in the middle of the night are from drunk dialing friends. I'll return the call tomorrow, if you know what I mean.
The way I see it, not much I could do about an emergency until morning anyway. Most of my people live out-of-town.
Posted by: Yabu at July 28, 2011 07:47 AM (ezDPm)
6
Yabu, since I have kids who live in a different city - last thing I want is to wait until morning to find out there was a emergency... Even if I couldn't be right there, I'd be making plans to get out of Dodge on the first flight headed that way...
Otherwise I think the story should have ended with
Get off my lawn!
It would then be perfect.
Posted by: Teresa at July 28, 2011 01:58 PM (xE2iU)
7
I hear you and completely understand. When my phone goes off in the middle of the night...I always hope it's a drunk dialer. What did people do before the latest and greatest communications?
Down here we say, "get outta my yard", just so you know, ain't no lawns down here, just yards. Bwahahahahahah!
I truly understand...gotta answer the call, unless the display says "Drunk Dialer".
Seriously, when my phone, or the Juju Woman's phone "rings" in the middle of the night, it tightens us up. I received a call a couple of weeks ago from the drunk dialer only to be told that a good friend of mine who lives in a different city had taken his own life. That's another story. Could it have waited to morning? No. We were packed and ready to leave as soon as possible.
I'm getting better at it, but the problem I have is remembering to put my cell on the bedside table. Gotta answer all of 'em.
Posted by: Yabu at July 29, 2011 09:46 AM (ezDPm)
8
Luckily I don't get too much by way of drunk dialing calls.

So when the phone does ring of course panic is the first thing that happens.
So sorry about your friend. There's nothing worse than getting that kind of news. *sigh*
Posted by: Teresa at July 29, 2011 01:08 PM (xE2iU)
9
I kicked the phone out of the bedroom years ago.
Talking is simply not what that room is for.
Posted by: Harvey at July 30, 2011 07:51 AM (pTueD)
10
I have a landline for those awful 5AM phone calls we get when something goes sideways. My husband keeps his cell on his dresser plugged in and on... the answering service calls that line when he has an emergency. My phone I turn off and plug in to charge every night in the kitchen. I need time to decompress...
Posted by: Bou at July 30, 2011 08:52 PM (NZHwq)
11
Bou - those are the calls we all dread, but have to leave the phone on to receive. *sigh*
Posted by: Teresa at August 01, 2011 09:53 PM (xE2iU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 21, 2011
Well... Yeah...
Seen on the intarwebs:
@JustinNOAA: Update: ~148 million under #heat advisories/warnings today; 32 states + DC
It's called SUMMER. My advice - look up the definition and learn. Good grief.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
02:29 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You mean... it's not glowball worming? 8-)
LOL!
Posted by: pam at July 21, 2011 04:46 PM (i3Kno)
2
Only in Algore's jet. heh.
Posted by: Teresa at July 21, 2011 10:52 PM (xE2iU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 20, 2011
Are You Ready for the Rapture?
I'm not sure what time it starts... no one told me. No mention of timezones either. But
the rapture is nearly upon us.
So are you headed to the Pearly Gates? If so the TSA is already ahead of you
@TSAgov Agent Smith In case of a Saturday rapture, please form a single-file line in front of the Pearly Gates for your security check.
If you don't plan on being one of the heavenly horde perhaps you'll join me for the looting spree all of Facebook has been planning...
In any case, if I can't get my iphone because the world ends a week early - I will make sure I have some fun instead.
Just sayin...
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
10:39 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 123 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Cute.
At least those of us left behind will have more job opportunities...
Posted by: pam at May 21, 2011 11:20 AM (i3Kno)
2
Do I still have time to get my nails did?
Posted by: Kim at May 21, 2011 02:12 PM (DRr3p)
3
Pam - very true - at least if you believe all these people who think they'll be chosen
Kim - I'd go for it. This rapture thing seems to be taking its time...
Posted by: Teresa at May 21, 2011 03:08 PM (xE2iU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 18, 2011
You Know There is too Much Going On When...
It's about 4 days between blog posts.
So what's new? How are ya?
Me? Just dandy.
My excitement for the week was reporting my SBUX card missing. Right after I got the email saying they were sending the new one, I found the card. Naturally. I have no recollection of putting it in with the paper money. I have never done that before. Weird.
Speaking of SBUX - I don't know what it is lately, but it seems every day for the last couple of weeks I've gotten in line behind a person reluctant to advance to the register. You know the ones - they leave a HUGE gap between themselves and the person in front of them so you have no idea if they are even in line. I want to take my shoulder and shove them forward.
We did go walking over the weekend. It's on my todo list to upload the pictures tomorrow. I had to spread things out so I can relax a bit.
That's about it for now. Time to get off the computer. I leave you with a pic of a tree with a fuzzy trunk.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
10:37 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 201 words, total size 1 kb.
1
When I was a noob at Starbucks (which was just a few months ago) I was afraid to advance because I was practicing the lingo for ordering in my head. True story.
Posted by: Laura at April 20, 2011 05:28 AM (ua7hq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 14, 2011
Mystery Water
Our house has a finished basement. I work down there... or maybe I should say here since I am sitting in the room itself as I type this. The room (formerly a bedroom for the previous owner's son) has a bathroom attached - en suite if you watch House Hunters International - heh. The bathroom is an inside room, no walls against the outside of the house. One wall borders the walk in closet for the room, the other 2 walls border the unfinished part of the basement where the heater lives.
It's not a large room, toilet, sink with some good counter space, a shower (no tub), and a linen closet. There is a small rug in front of the sink area.
I mention the rug because the rug is the first problem I noticed.
I walked into the bathroom yesterday morning and the rug was laying at an angle in front of the toilet.
Odd.
I knew I hadn't moved it. I figured my husband had for some reason although I couldn't imagine why. I bent down to pick it up and it was soaking wet. Wet like someone had taken a pitcher of water and upended it on the rug. Of course I started looking around. There was no sign the water had overflowed the toilet. I looked under the sink. The floor of the cabinet was completely dry. I looked around the edges of the sink cabinet. No sign the water had come out from under the cabinet, the wood was dry.
Freaky.
That evening I told my husband what happened. He grabbed a flashlight and headed into the bathroom to look around. He saw no problem with the plumbing on the back of the toilet, no sign either that the sink was leaking. The walls all looked dry and unstained. Then he looked in the shower. It never occurred to me to look there since there's tray with about a 4 inch edge - how could water get from the shower to the floor? It didn't seem probable.
Wrong?
Or maybe not. There was a small puddle in the shower and the drain cover was askew... except we don't use that shower so where did the water come from? Why had the drain cover moved? Then he looked in the linen closet and found the entire floor wet. I never even thought to look in there.
The rag bag and a couple bags with old bed linens reside on the floor there. I pulled them out. Got rid of the dead bugs that had accumulated since I last cleaned it and got to work getting it washed and dried again. There's a drain clean out down there, but no sign of leaking around it.
In the meantime my husband checked the unfinished part of the basement. Along the wall, between the shower and the sink, water had leaked out of the bathroom.
But where did the water come from? How did it get there? It had to have happened over night. My husband suspects somehow water backed up into the shower due to a clog which eventually gave way. He looked closer at the shower drain. It's very possible the drain around the shower leaks. Since we don't use that shower, we'd never know it.
I suspect our water treatment system did it's weekly back wash, which it does about once a week in the middle of the night, and that's where the water came from. It backed up into the shower tray and leaked around the drain, soaking the floor. I might be wrong about that, but it's a theory.
Still... not being 100% sure, it's very unsettling. We've had many past experiences with water in basements - none of them good. Because we aren't sure what is going on, we will await events. If it happens again we'll have to bring in a plumber.
I'm not optimistic.
Posted by: Teresa in
Ummmmm
at
11:23 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 656 words, total size 4 kb.
1
As Scooby Doo would say, "Ruh-roh!"
Good luck.
Posted by: Jack at April 15, 2011 10:21 AM (VpPTf)
2
Ha! Yes he would say that. So far no new mystery water... stay tuned.
Posted by: Teresa at April 15, 2011 03:20 PM (xE2iU)
3
How very odd. Hope you find the cause, because that's the sort of thing that can keep one awake at night... or maybe just me...
Posted by: pam at April 15, 2011 04:05 PM (i3Kno)
4
LOL - the threat of water anywhere in the house really does keep us awake at night. We've already had a house that flooded twice so it's not something we disregard. OTOH so far so good... we'll just hope now.
Posted by: Teresa at April 15, 2011 09:15 PM (xE2iU)
5
I've gone through the mystery water before...gotta find the source. Easier said than done.
Posted by: Yabu at April 18, 2011 08:33 AM (RDdNW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
114kb generated in 0.1891 seconds; 86 queries returned 314 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.